Thread for Thought

What Tove's Wearing

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Suits and Statements

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

"feminist": http://slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/05/a-tux-clad-rihanna-returns-to-the-red-carpet.aspx pics: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/met-costume-institute-gal_n_196534.html http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2009/05/all_the_looks_on_the_met_gala.html#photo=1 Madonna: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/madonna-at-the-met-a-mini_n_196527.html tuxes - Rihanna in D&G tux, Lake Bell, Twiggy, Lauren Bush: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/rihanna-at-the-met-tuxedo_n_196537.html Diane Keaton 2004 Academy Awards http://www.mtv.com/news/photos/t/tuxedos_women_050509/diane_tux.jpg Greta Garbo press shot for Morocco (1930) - admitted bisexual, which was shocking for 1930s America (though slightly less so for her adopted city Berlin) http://www.mtv.com/news/photos/t/tuxedos_women_050509/marlene_tux.jpg K.D. Lang dons suits often, including her aptly named "Drag" album cover:http://images.uulyrics.com/cover/k/kd-lang/album-drag.jpg Haruka Tenou, the alter ego of Sailor Uranus, 17 years old, is so good at her tomboy look that she fools the Sailor Scouts. Haruka's ambition is to be a race car driver. (Does this remind you of any other Japanese anime character? Speed Racer always was too pretty to be a boy, with those long lashes.) In the Sailor Moon episodes aired on U.S. TV Haruka's lesbianism has been dubbed out, and her relationship with her girlfirend Michirou (Sailor Neptune) changed to "cousins." http://www.dandeliondesign.ca/Ties/haruka1.gif Radclyffe Hall (1880-1943). Author of the classic The Well of Loneliness (1928). Like the main character of her novel, Stephen Gordon, Radclyffe wore men's suits.It's unfortunate that the furor over The Well (it was banned in Britain; attempts to ban it in the U.S. were unsuccessful) has overshadowed Radclyffe's other novels, like the very funny Saturday Life. She was a best-selling author in her time and it is unfortunate that she has been forgotten. Radclyffe Hall, standing, with her partner, Lady Una Troubridge, 1927: http://robertarood.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/radclyffe.jpg Radclyffe Hall reclining in sophisticated drag: http://www.afterellen.com/archive/ellen/column/2005/photos/7/day/Radclyffe.jpg Madonna, Binky, Celine Dion 1999 Academy Awards, Angie Jolie 2001 Academy Awards Rihanna appears for the first time since she was allegedly beaten by now-ex-boyfriend Chris Brown in power tux: "Ostensibly, she is making the statement that she is powerful; that she does not need protection. However, it troubles me that she feels that she needs to dress in masculine garb to express her self-possession. It sends the tacit message that feminine equals weak, and what happened to Rihanna has nothing to do with weakness." http://slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/05/a-tux-clad-rihanna-returns-to-the-red-carpet.aspx response: Is Madonna intimating that females are the weaker sex when she dresses in drag, or borrows masculine elements for her ensembles? men: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/the-men-of-the-met-tom-br_n_196538.html Recommended reading: "How to Dress for Success" 4/20/09, Forbes

Led Zeppelin's "The Song Remains the Same"

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

I watched the 1976 music movie by Led Zeppelin, one of my favorite bands of all time, last night. Though images of the band-- and Robert Plant in particular-- are not unknown to me, I still could not believe how many fashion standards they bent or broke outright in their appearances. Their music was not lambasted, as was that of David Bowie and other glam rockers, for being too gender ambiguous. Their music is pure classic rock with heavy drums, screaming guitar, and wailing vocals, all contributing to a unambiguous masculine sound. But their hair! Their clothes! Their accessories! These all contradicted their raw male sound, and this particular movie, which was mostly live footage from a concert at Madison Square Garden, exemplified . Let's begin with that sex symbol Robert Plant. He was bedecked in

Robert Plant:

Gangster with blank face
Robert Plant’s effeminate outfit:
- Little girls’ shirts with cap sleeves, worn open to expose nipples and stomach down to ileum
- Rings, necklaces
- Coupled with hyper sexual male- painted on jeans with the entire outline of his penis visible
- Unbelievably luscious curly blonde hair that is genuinely long, not just shaggy
Uninhibited performances give sensation of spying on Plant fucking his mike
British teeth – he’s missing one or two, remaining outlined with plaque
- Rock / pop star could never get away with the snaggle tooth now in a perfectly formed face and body. Age of extreme makeovers, make tans and electric bleached smiles mandatory
Girlie embroidery literally balances crotch with penis
- Embroidered: 2 doves frame a heart, continues motif of film – footage of doves flying
Chunky, heeled boots
Thick black leather belt with meaty silver square buckle with coral diamond
Long sideburns

Jimmie Page:

Pants have constellation system with a huge round planet on hip and butt on black ground
- Bellbottoms with thick silver trim at cuffs, high waisted
Jacket #1:
- Black velvet with dripping foot-long fringe
- Trickle of fringe at inner crotch
Jacket #2:
- Black ¾ sleeved embroidered with large red poppies(?)

Bass:

Sunflower print with long silk polyester
Blonde pageboy cut, not unlike Javier Bardem’s character in No Country for Old Men

Political Canidates & Color

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

I've spoken before about politicians and the consideration they must take in dressing themselves. I want to concentrate on color now, and the impact it has (or should) upon these selections. [caption id="attachment_147" align="aligncenter" width="209" caption="Laura Bush & Cindy McCain in blue"][/caption] And here: [caption id="attachment_148" align="aligncenter" width="206" caption="Obama women in blue at 2008 DNC"][/caption] And here: [caption id="attachment_149" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Obamas & Bidens in red"][/caption] Further reading:

"Color & Design in Politics: Campaign Posters" ColorLovers.com

Kilts ahoy!

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

"Particularly fascinating is the book’s discussion of the traditional, yet rebellious lineage of Tartan, which was exploited by contemporary designers such as Alexander McQueen (ex: Highland Rape collection, 95-96) and Vivienne Westwood, as well as by artists like Matthew Barney." I read an article where I discovered in an ongoing effort to revitalize the tweed industry (which I wasn't, honestly, aware was suffering, though I suppose everything niche market is), Sir Sean Connery presided over "Dressed to Kilt: Colors of Scotland" on March 30. Apparently "weavers and mills producing the cloth have required financial support from UK Government and European funds." "Clothes by Ann McCallum and Scottish designer of the year Deryck Walker were modeled at the event, organized by the Harris Tweed Authority. .... the Scottish Government said just over £170,000 of European funds will be used to support Harris Tweed, with £82,000 allocated to training the next generation of weavers." Economic hardships aside, I love me some kilt action (friends will giggle as they know the full extent of this love). Gender lines are blurred for the sake of practicality, comfort and tradition. Alas, most men have no idea how delicious ventilation is! I love the contrast between the feminine associations with skirts and the manliness of the man who dares to wear them. Met Costume Institute exhibition "Braveheart: Men in Skirts" (2003-2004) explored not only the rich history but also the continuous morphing and adoption of skirts in men's fashion. Skirts for men have the feeling of being very primitive and traditional, but also somehow futuristic, perhaps because many visions of the future involve the blurring of gender roles. Men, if you're not braveheart enough (unresistable bad joke, apologies) to go with the full-fledged traditional plaid kilts, try on a Utilikilt. Only invented in the 1990s, the grass roots company was founded in 2000, they're more rough-and-tumble, a bit hardcore carpenter-y. The company understands and actually uses the discomfort that many men feel about skirts, using well placed jibes to encourage potential customers to take the plunge: "If you're man enough," one page concludes with a wink. Here are some of my favorites: The Original Utilikilt has deep cargo pockets and wrap-around "Neo-Traditional" closure with snaps: The Workman's model will "make any pants-loving wimp cry" with its heavy duty material and built in toolbelt: The Mocker model targets businessmen, with its sleek, hidden pockets: Last but not least is the Tuxedo model is for your formal occasions: The company really plays up the rough and tumble workman / rebel aspect of their products in its marketing, rather than attempting to convert people who already wear traditional wool kilts. They're comfortable and practical, but they're also edgy because Americans are still uncomfortable with the disolution of gender boundaries. Influences: Troy the movie? This is not the typical Utilikilter, but I love how he took this item to a whole new place: instead of toughening it up, he nerdified the manly skirt with the pulled up socks and Rod Laver Adidas'. Not a look I'd recommend necessarily, but you gotta love his commitment. Thom Browne's man skirt selling: http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2009/05/shoppers_evidently_have_an_app.html Discount shopping site Gilt Groupe is currently hosting a Thom Browne sale. Browne's skirt suit, which retailed for $4,370 but was marked down to $1,288, has already sold out. So presumably some men not only yearn to add skirts to their wardrobes, but they're willing to spend four figures to do so."

1930s Sirens...and Katie Holmes?

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

As this official recession has been compared to the Great Depression many times now, this period is understandably being likened to the 1930s. Now I love the 30s-- the glamour shots of silver screen movie stars, hard-boiled detective novels, impossibly immaculate women and dapper, broad men in striped suits.... I am also fascinated by the disconnect between the upper (the slightly less extremely wealthy) and lower classes (the struggling and genuinely impoverished) populations that were exacerbated by the stock market crash. In December, the Times Magazine did a photo shoot with Katie Holmes styled as 30s silver screen goddess-- fake eyelashes, elongated thin brows, ruby mouth, while luxuriating carelessly in satin robes on divans.... I hope we do not fall into more conservative social / moral progressiveness with a resurgence of the Hays Code prudishness or something.

Equestrian Style

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Midnight on a Friday in New York City I was doing the usual -- watching the Equestrian World Cup show jumping final from Las Vegas, that is. Allow me to provide the visual setup for anyone whose only point of reference is National Velvet (1944) and still shots of Coco chanel at the tracks with her patrician lover. There are various jumps around a labyrinthine course with end poles shaped and painted like pastel East Land Village cutouts: 2-dimensional purple school houses hold up one jump, buttercup yellow windmills hold another. The riders' jackets all have the primary color of red, blue, navy or gray, accented with collars of red, blue, white or mustard, sometimes with yet another color of contrasting collar edging. Everyone wears identical white stretch pants and tall black leather boots. Helmets were not the cute velvet caps of past (I've considered buying a vintage one for winter months), but a design that more closely resembles a car racing helmet, but still in the traditional black. Gender: masculine - where menswear crept into female garb. Scandallous shorter hemlines (and woman-on-horse grinding, the flushed face of robust outdoor exursion... etc.). "Rider attire may be somewhat less formal than that used in hunter riding. However, an approved ASTM/SEI equestrian helmet with a harness is always required, and is a practical necessity to protect the rider's head in the event of a fall. Tall boots are required, usually black. Spurs are optional, but commonly used. Breeches are traditional in color, usually white, tan, or beige. At approved competitions, depending on sanctioning organization, a dark-colored coat is usually worn (though under the rules of the USEF tweed or wash jackets are allowed in the summer and lighter colors are currently in fashion), with a light-colored (usually white) ratcatcher-style shirt and either a choker or stock tie. However, especially in the summer, many riders wear a simple short-sleeved "polo" style shirt with helmet, boots and breeches, and even where coats are required, the judges may waive the coat rule in extremely hot weather. Gloves, usually black, are optional, as is braiding of the horse. At FEI Grand Prix levels, tradition is very strong and riders dress in a more formal manner. White shirts and breeches are worn with black boots. Members of some national teams, including the United States, may be seen in red jackets, a color reserved for only riders of the Grand Prix level; otherwise international competitors usually wear a dark navy jacket, sometimes with national insignia added." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equestrian_helmet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dressage#Turnout_of_the_horse http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_riding http://www.worldcuplasvegas.com/

Global Fashion

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Global fashion spaces and places** On Wednesday May 13, The New School University is hosting a panel discussion and book launch of The Fabric of Cultures: Fashion, Identity & Globalization, edited by Eugenia Paulicelli and Hazel Clark. The Fabric of Cultures examines the impact of fashion as a manufacturing industry and as a culture industry that shapes the identities of nations and cities in a cross‐cultural perspective, within a global framework. The collected essays investigate local and global economies, cultures and identities and the book offers, for the first time, a wide spectrum of case studies which focus on a diversity of geographical spaces and places, from global capitals of fashion such as New York, to countries less known or identifiable for fashion such as contemporary Greece and Soviet Russia. http://www3.fitnyc.edu/museum/FabricOfCultures.pdf

Toilet Paper as Textile

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Cheap-ChicWeddings.com sponsored a contest for the most impressive wedding gowns made of -- I know, the punchline is given away by the title of this post -- toilet paper! Yes, this humble stuff is the focus of an annual challenge to use as the sole fabric of a wedding dress. I'm always interested to learn how technology affects textiles and by extension, fashion, but it's equally interesting to be confronted with garments made of material whose primary function is not the building block of a dress (some will recall my earlier post on a similar duct tape prom dress competition). Though I myself have never tackled such a garment, challenges working with this particular paper would, I imagine, include transparency and flimsiness. But like all materials, I suspect experimenting with various brands would be part of the process, finding the texture, weight, stiffness, etc., that best suited various parts of the garment. Frankly, the whole contest reminds me a bit of the Charmin "quilted" toilet paper ads of bears and things sewing toilet paper for a supposedly softer, quilted product. It strikes me as hilarious that non-cartoon animals tackle this task. Following are this year's winners. First place winner:

1st place winner, Ann Kagawa Lee's toilet paper wedding dress

[caption id="attachment_593" align="aligncenter" width="233" caption="Ann Kagawa Lee's dress from the back"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_594" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Ann Kagawa Lee's matching wedding hat"][/caption]

2nd place winner:

[caption id="attachment_595" align="aligncenter" width="168" caption="Terri Glover's wedding dress"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_596" align="aligncenter" width="225" caption="Terri Glover's dress from the back"][/caption]

3rd place winner:

[caption id="attachment_597" align="aligncenter" width="225" caption="Guadalupe Andrade's dress"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_599" align="aligncenter" width="225" caption="Guadalupe Andrade's dress from the back"][/caption] -disposable fashion -Cold War fashion Further Reading:

Fear and Anxiety: Fashion in the Cold War

Suit Drive

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:10:32 +0000

I wanted to share news of what I consider to be a highly worthy cause: the Men's Wearhouse is holding a National Suit Drive campaign - "dedicated to empowering unemployed men by providing them with professional work attire that will build their self-esteem and make a good first impression during job interviews." From September 1 - October 31, people nationwide may donate their gently used suits, sport coats, slacks, dress shirts, ties and belts to help other men re-enter the workforce and take back control of their lives. MW will gather and distribute clothing to more than 120 local and regional non-profit organizations in cities across the country. To learn more, visit their site. When most of us are looking for employment, we dig back in our closets and/or purchase new suit gear which is still the standard conservative, confidence-exuding attire necessary to make a good impression in the corporate and even non-profit worlds. This is obviously not so easy for people already out of work and/or with limited funds. Isn't it a sadly ironic that the we attempt to display ourselves as financially successful when we're seeking employment (i.e. to get paid)??

: : : : : : : : : : :

Superheroes Attack!

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:48:08 +0000

Style.com listed "Superhero Worship" as one of its major Fall 2008 trends: "At about the same time that the Met will be putting its superhero paraphernalia back in storage, fashion-forward females will be preparing to unleash their new Fall power ensembles-- a futuristic Balenciaga dress, for instance, or a caped jacket from Rick Owens. Pieces like Haider Ackermann's tough leather jacket or Fendi's funnel-collared furs command confidence and demand a good pair of heels-- perhaps not ideal for leaping tall buildings, but then, Superman's already got that part covered." Though I don't expend a lot of energy keeping up with current fads, this one was a bit unusual as it seems to be a direct result of a museum's exhibit; it's a good (and obvious) reminder that trends pass easily through the art world. There were a plethora of Picasso exhibits in the early 2000's (P.S. 1's "After Matisse and Picasso," 2003; it's accompanying exhibit at MoMA "Matisse/Picasso," 2003; the Whitney's "Picasso and American Art," 2006-07; the Met's "Cezanne to Picasso: Abroise Vollard, Patron of the Avant-Garde," (2006-07) and it's telling that the influence in the art world like the Met Museum can throw an exhibit on Superheroes that rocks the movie and fashion world in quick succession. I noticed Armani Exchange storefronts boasted primary blue T-shirts with their logo written in yellow and red Superman font smeared across it in the months during the Met exhibit, and there were more superhero themed blockbuster movies this summer than I can recall from recent years: The Incredible Hulk, Hellboy II, Iron Man, The Dark Knight, not to mention fringe "superhero" flicks that involve extraordinary feats of strength, endurance, skill, and/or mystical beings like Indiana Jones, Speed Racer, and the Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian. Bringing it back to the runway, current fashion has also been swept up in the hurricane of superhero inspiration. Here are some of my favorites: The following Balenciaga piece from Fall 08 has a feeling of space age chainmail, doesn't it? It's definitely got something of a 16th century male warrior's feel about it. I particularly enjoy the latex thigh high fetish stiletto boots and silver parachute cape-- fetish gear is pretty standard for superheroines (think Catwoman, Batgirl), though it's only slightly less practical for the average socialite gallivanting around the standard cocktail parties. And actually, the thigh-high boots are not terribly dissimilar from the high leather boots (sans platforms and stilettos) worn by men in the 15th century. [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="223" caption="Balenciaga - Fall 08"][/caption] This one too, seems reminiscent of Medieval armor, but pixelated: [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="223" caption="Gareth Pugh - Fall 08"][/caption]

This one reminds me a bit of the costumes in 1982's futuristic Tron. [caption id="attachment_283" align="aligncenter" width="200" caption="Louise Golden - Fall 08"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_284" align="aligncenter" width="265" caption=" "][/caption]

The real test of the impact of such an exhibit will be if these fashions will be disseminated and accepted by the masses, i.e. not haute couture clients. Will any of you be wearing armor and capes in the near future? I kinda hope so....

: : : : : : : : : : :

Book Review: "Fashion and Its Social Agendas"

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:38:51 +0000

Fashion and Its Social Agendas: Class, Gender, and Identity in Clothing by Diana Crane

My review

rating: 5 of 5 stars This book was so good! Lots of statistics-- which as any fashion reader knows is pretty uncommon-- of class, social, and monetary indicators, some of which suggested conclusions different from what I'd believed. Well organized chapters in approximate chronological order that concentrated on class struggles, gender discrepancies in spending, wearing, and reading fashion images, etc. It weakened a bit in the last chapter or two as Crane struggled to distill late 20th century fashion complexities, but I'll forgive her that, the rest was so impressive.

: : : : : : : : : : :

"Arbiters of Style" tour at FIT

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:16:06 +0000

I attended a lecture at the Museum at FIT last week. I'd visited the exhibition "Arbiters of Style: Women at the Forefront of Fashion" a couple months ago and thought it was a little weak (my usual complaint: "not enough signage!", but I went to the tour believing that if I got more information about the collection, it would be a more fulfilling experience. I was mistaken. The clothes displayed are stunning, and our group was informed that many of them have not been exhibited before, but the exhibit itself is lacking a cohesive theme: "Women at the Forefront of Fashion" is simply too damn vague. It might have been salvaged by wall text that provided information about the role of women in the fashion industry: how it was a natural progression from sewing for the family at home to assisting neighbors with their garments, to designing textiles (usually with no credit). I've read tidbits on the distinction of roles between men and women in the fashion industry, how women were often not credited, how seamstresses were considered mindless, unskilled positions compared to (male) tailors' supposed talent, etc. There were actually laws passed in many countries outlining strict guidelines for the fashion jobs men and women were allowed to take on-- everything from construction to design to tailoring to embellishment. It was even pointed out at a panel discussion at FIT last year that the gender issue remains unresolved: that the vast majority of people working in fashion are women, and yet the majority of highly publicized fashion houses are run by men.... None of these tidbits of information were alluded to, much less explored in the exhibit or lecture. Instead, the focus seemed to be on "modernity," which was, I suppose, the tie-in to the subtitle "...at the Forefront of Fashion." But just as an essay needs a hypothesis, so does an exhibit, unless it is a "works from the collection" type display (which every museum is certainly entitled to). That being said, I did have a few moments of excitement in the tour. There was an evening dress c. 1840 whose fabric dated to c. 1760. FIT conservators deduced that the original 18th century garment had been reworked to keep up with later 19th century trends. Specifically, a pointed waistband had been added, and-- most interestingly-- the bodice had been turned around to be worn back-to-front, with ruching added to embellish the new au currant neckline. This ingenious modification enabled the wearer to maintain the fashionable standard of having the clasp in the back, where in earlier years it was the practice to clasp in front.

I'm all about upcycling and repurposing clothes, so this struck me as particularly awesome (I've also been known to wear shirts backwards to alter the necklines). It's taken an economic recession (fast becoming a depression) to resurrect the retooling of clothes, which have become so disposable in recent decadent decades. In previous centuries, textiles were so precious and the labor that went into the creation of clothes so intensive that it was the rule rather than the exception to re-fit, re-accessorize, and retool them. I hope we return to quality clothes with the expectation that they will survive many years and even multiple owners, taking an example from garments like this dress which was in active wear for a full century. I keep my own wardrobe new by periodically altering existing items-- it's amazing how changing the hemline, adding buttons or decorative zippers, or even turning them backwards breathes new life into them.

: : : : : : : : : : :

Virtual Clothes Shopping

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:50:28 +0000

9/19 By late October, Sears.com expects to unveil a virtual fitting room involving a 3D visual search and to-scale virtual model to try on its entire collection (I have played with other sites that have virtual models for only partial collections, which is very frustrating after you've gone through the trouble of creating your body). Sears, IBM WebSphere Commerce and My Virtual Model, together unveiled a first-of-its-kind 3D visual search and e-commerce capability for Sears.com that they claim will significantly improve and enhance consumers' online shopping experiences. This new tool will allow consumers to search for merchandise using images instead of words. Also, they can build and personalize a virtual model that matches their measurements -- height, weight, body shape -- and even a headshot photo. "This solution is clean, elegant, and fun," said Louise Guay, president and founder of My Virtual Model. The 3D angle allows users to view garments on themselves from the front, side and back, to ensure that the style, color, pattern and fit are right. Shoppers can also email images of their looks to friends and family to help them make final purchasing decisions. ***************************************** H&M + Sims Swedish fashion chain Hennes & Mauritz has joined forces with Electronic Arts (EA) to create a virtual world of fashion. EA is the creator of the popular computer game The Sims, and together with H&M has created The Sims 2 H&M Fashion Stuff Pack. Available through EA online and in stores later this month, the stuff pack contains virtual replicas of clothing from the fashion chain's summer collection. Also included are all the items you might need to create your own H&M store: mannequins, clothing racks, changing rooms, cash registers and more. The Sims 2 H&M Fashion Runway Showcase will launch at the same time. The showcase invites players of the game to create outfits for six different design themes. The public will vote online for the top twelve entries each week, which will be featured in the Fashion Runway Showcase. The winner's creation will subsequently be put into production and will be sold in H&M stores. "We are very excited that H&M is the first brand to enter The Sims world in this way. For us, the stuff pack is a fun opportunity to meet our customers in a new and exciting environment and to show parts of our summer collection," H&M's Head of Marketing Jörgen Andersson said. ***************************************************** October, iStylista.com shall be launched featuring style secrets, body and face shape clarification, color analysis and clothing styling tips to name but a few. The stylist site aims to be objective and to help women to discover their natural style and feel more confident in their appearance at a fraction of the cost of hiring a personal stylist. Celebrity stylist Gok Wan and star of the popular ‘How To Look Good Naked’ charges £5,000 a day – iStylista.com provides detailed and highly personalized style theory secrets for £30 within a 20 page guide that you can refer to for years to come. Visitors simply answer a series of twenty quick fire questions related to their shape, lifestyle, natural coloring and vital statistics before they can download their personalized style guide. A free trial (‘Fashion Diva’) is available for all visitors, or alternatively choose from two more detailed reports (Glamour Puss £10 & Style Goddess £30) which come with a money back guarantee should the visitor not appreciate its value. Founder and professional personal stylist Chantelle Znideric said: “My style guides are there to teach ladies the basics of styling for their natural features. The advice is a building block for shopping trips and is designed to save ladies an absolute fortune knowing what suits and what doesn’t – no more impulse buys that never get worn!” iStylista.com is founded by internet entrepreneur Hayden Allen-Vercoe and professional personal stylist (and fashion columnist) Chantelle Znideric, iStylista Ltd thrives off high volumes of traffic from one of the UK’s leading fashion blogs, Topstylista.com. ************************************************* Aug 07 Giorgio Armani will be expanding his emporium and open an online boutique on the 3-D virtual world Second Life. The store will allow viewers to purchase the brand's top 10 products virtually via Second Life currency, the Linden dollar, or in actuality. More significantly, coming in September, Armani will start selling all Emporio Armani products online in the U.S. as part of an ongoing strategy of expanding e-commerce. A soft unveiling of the Emporio Armani site is slated for Aug. 14, while the official launch will take place Sept. 7, to coincide with the Neiman Marcus Crystal Charity luncheon in Dallas. ************************************************ I myself find it difficult to believe any of these could replace the physical act of shopping, feeling fabrics, seeing colors in person (I'm skeptical of all colors I see online as a self-professed color snob), and yes, even trying them on. If anyone knows anything about clothes / fashion shopping in Second Life, I'm very curious to hear more about it!

Susan Meiselas Photography Exhibit

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:57:41 +0000

Just saw the Susan Meiselas exhibit at the International Center of Photography. Though none of her carnie stripper photos were there, her pictures of the popular insurrection Nicaragua (1978-79) and Kurdistan were stunning, with an eerie unprofessional air about many of them.

From the Nicaragua series there was one photo of a young woman in a red dress pushing a tarped body strapped to a rickety cart as she looked over her shoulder backwards. A video taken years later captured the story of the woman who revealed the body was her husband who'd been shot, she was desperate to bury him with as much dignity as possible. She begged neighbors for a box in which to bury him, but the best she could get was a plank, onto which she strapped him, wrapped in a cloth or sheet. The picture was taken as she was rolling him alone to his resting place, and she recounted how she was shot at by low flying helicopters while making the journey. She pointed out that she was especially visible because of her bright red dress, which had struck me in the photo as being particularly vivid and pretty in an otherwise desolate landscape of muted tones of rubble and dust, but her story added that additional layer of urgency: that her bright dress (perhaps her Sunday best for the private funeral, though she didn't specify) actually became a liability to her own life as she was forced to dive under the corpse of her murdered husband's (less conspicuous) body for cover.

[caption id="attachment_92" align="aligncenter" width="161" caption="Sandinista's Revolution Mask"][/caption]

Though many of the rebels covered their faces with handkerchiefs and rags-- which is very menacing in and of itself-- a traditional Indian dance mask was adopted by the Sandinistas in Monimbo, Nicaragua. These masks were egg-shaped and made of mesh painted with a rather blank, sexless, wide-eyed doll-like expression that completely obscured the wearer's true features and facial shape while allowing them visibility. This served the dual purpose of concealing rebels' identities while simultaneously advertising their allegiance with their political movement as a more traditional army would with a more complete uniform. The mask also struck me as being extremely similar to a fencing mask I'd seen in one of my favorite East Village shops Obscura just yesterday.

[caption id="attachment_93" align="aligncenter" width="124" caption="Susan Meiseles - Kurdistan mass grave with clothes"][/caption]

In Kurdistan, Northern Iraq Meiselas took a photo of an uncovered mass grave and a woman looking pitifully down at it. Horror of the subject matter aside, I was puzzled by the discrepancy between the decomposition of the bodies-- which had been reduced to mere skeletons-- and their clothes, which seemed to be mostly in tact. Textiles are notoriously fragile-- how did they remain unscathed?

[caption id="attachment_94" align="aligncenter" width="234" caption="Susan Meiselas - Kurdistan graves"][/caption]

My final thought was on a photo of another grave site, where the clothes of the deceased had been carefully laid out as makeshift grave markers (photo here not the actual one I saw, but same gist). Without reading the caption, it just looked like a bunch of dirty clothes strewn on the ground. Though the items had been used as a shabby substitution for more permanent gravestones, the shirts and pants laid out like a mother might lay an outfit on her child's bed was inventive, effective, and beautifully touching.

Is anyone else aware of situations where clothes were used for grave markers?

: : : : : : : : : : :

Iran's Catwalk Regulations

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:34:53 +0000

[caption id="attachment_280" align="aligncenter" width="214" caption="An Iranian model presents the latest Islamic fashion for women at a fashion show"][/caption] I just read an article about rules being imposed upon models on Iranian catwalks by the Culture and Islamic Guidance Ministry:

"Move modestly. No garish makeup. Don loose and unrevealing clothing. Those are some of the new rules for Iranian models, who have been told not to attract too much attention during fashion shows. Live models "should avoid any behavior that would distract visitors' attention from the clothes put on display," according to the eight-part "Guideline For Fashion And Dress Shows." Models are not allowed to show off the curves of their bodies, and their hair should not be seen," the document reads. "The wearing of tight and body-hugging clothes and types of makeup that are incompatible with Islamic and Iranian culture are prohibited."

Am I wrong, or isn't the point of models to attract attention? They are walking display cases of fashionable goods. It's revealing (haha) that they don't ban the entire profession of modeling; instead they systematically ban every part of the job description. Also, these regulations are written as though they address models, but it is the designers who will have to make the largest adjustments, for it is not the model who decides how short the skirt is or how clingy a garment is. This is a transparently misguided attempt to stave off dirty Western influence from the unsullied reputations of Iran's citizens. A bullet point from the Ministry of Culture's website:

"Conducting research works on the propaganda campaign of international media and becoming familiar with their techniques and the ways to counter their measures if needed."

The root problem, as the Iranian government sees it, seems to be the perception that being exposed to-- and heaven forbid, adopting-- Western visual aesthetics is an assault upon the very foundation of Islam and its people. In looking up the definition of hijab, I discovered that one of its root meanings is "to shelter," which manages to sound protective and sweet. Not so darling are the alternate root definitions of "to cover" and "to screen," which imply outright censorship. I find the idea of attempting to govern morality through uniforms-- because that is essentially what the hijab is-- absolutely laughable. You may be effectively covering sexual organs, but after all, uniforms are one of the most common fetishes. Though a primary function of a uniform is to identify a person as a member of a particular group, and often to convey asexual professionalism, the result is more often than not the very opposite of that intention. Everything from military and firemen uniforms to nun, priest, and Catholic school uniforms are firmly rooted in the fetish world, and have been for (at least) hundreds of years. This connection is not mere coincidence. Deny simple activities or pleasures, cloak bodies or processes in mystery, and the mystique surrounding those forbidden objects or activities will increase in direct proportion to the severity of the taboo. I'm curious to hear other people's take on this issue, please share!

: : : : : : : : : : :

About the Author

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:37:09 +0000

I am a sassy New Yorker who formally studied English, Costume Design, and Art History, but I continue my education and fuel my love of Costume History by reading voraciously, attending lectures, exhibits, galleries, and films. Though I have many loves (color theory, burlesque, yarn crafts, and bookbinding among them), fashion remains a filter that I use to read and interpret politics, social and class struggles, gender and sexual identity themes, and more. For someone who has struggled with retaining numbers and dates, fashion studies offered me concrete visual accompaniment to historical events, and continues to be a benchmark of more "serious" subjects.

I currently work in Development for a major New York museum with no costume collection (most unfortunately), and I am the Editor of the Costume Society of America E-Newsletter. I am eager to land a job involving costume/fashion/textile research/education, but as yet, that opportunity has not come.

I love to hear from readers, so drop me a line with questions, comments and suggestions!

~Tove

ThreadForThought@gmail.com

MAD Museum Opening Event & Exhibit

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:11:26 +0000

I attended the grand re-opening of the Museum of Design (somewhat humorously abbreviated to "MAD Museum") at it's new location on Columbus Circle, an event I had been hotly anticipating even before I received an invitation to the party; I love all sorts of crafts, and textile arts are often included under this broad header. To my delight, there were several textile related pieces that drew my notice.

Do Do Suh's "Metal Jacket" (1992-2001) was a sleek and impressive garment reminiscent of an Asian (perhaps Korean?) coat of armor that was comprised of 3,000 stamped army dogtags. In addition to the lovely craftsmanship, I adore the beautiful irony of dogtags being a necessary body ornament in war, but completely ineffectual as protection: they are the most functional after their wearer has been wounded or killed already.

Susie MacMurray's "A Mixture of Frailties" (2004) was comprised of hundreds of heavy-duty latex gloves turned inside-out and attached to form a feathered wedding dress of sorts. The gloves' cleaning function was a clear commentary on the (continued) subservient role of women-- especially within marraige): the overwhelming majority of maids and cleaners in the world are women, both professionally and in their personal lives. Now what could the suffocating effect of the rubber and weight of all those gloves be commentary of? (These aren't my thoughts, people, I'm just interpreting art here!)

Terese Agnew's "Portrait of a Textile Worker" (2005) was a large (98" x 100") wall hanging canvas depicting women in a workshop / sweatshop. Unusual that the workroom appears quite tidy - even austere. It depicts textile workers less like frenzied slaves than as lonely, single-purposed drones. I like how the sewing table in the foreground takes up almost the whole lower half of the piece, as was a common of Japanese woodblock prints, and Impressionist paintings (that borrowed the idea from the Japanese); it effectively gives the illusion that the sewing table is engulfing not only its worker, but the room.

Did I mention that it's made of 30,000 clothing labels sewn together? Speaking of drones at sewing machines, how many indirectly participated in the creation of this project?

Devorah Sperber's "After the Mona Lisa" was 5,084 spools of thread strung on metal chains hanging from the ceiling like a beaded door. It was near impossible to see any specific picture in the chunky colored rolls, but when viewed through the small crystal ball set up in front of it, the Mona Lisa-- holding a camera pointed at you, the voyeur tourist-- popped out at you. Armed with the knowledge of what famous image you're looking at now, you can revisit the oversized pixels of colored thread and see that the spools actually depict that great lady upside-down, which compounded the difficulty in seeing her in the first place. I like the whole camera obscura low-tech aspect of this project, in addition to the pretty pretty thread.

I'd love to hear of other people's favorite textile artworks....

: : : : : : : : : : :

Do Ho Suh "Metal Jacket" (1992 - 2001)

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:33:09 +0000

"Metal Jacket" was a sleek and impressive garment reminiscent of an Asian (perhaps Korean?) coat of armor that was comprised of 3,000 stamped army dogtags. In addition to the lovely craftsmanship, I adore the beautiful irony of dogtags being a necessary body ornament in war, but completely ineffectual as protection: they are the most functional after their wearer has been wounded or killed already.

Susie MaCmurray - "a Mixture of Frailties" (2004)

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:39:57 +0000

"A Mixture of Frailties" (2004) was comprised of hundreds of heavy-duty latex gloves turned inside-out and attached to form a feathered wedding dress of sorts. The gloves' cleaning function was a clear commentary on the (continued) subservient role of women-- especially within marraige): the overwhelming majority of maids and cleaners in the world are women, both professionally and in their personal lives. Now what could the suffocating effect of the rubber and weight of all those gloves be commentary of? (These aren't my thoughts, people, I'm just interpreting art here!)

Terese Agnew - "Portrait of a Textile Worker (2005)

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:42:32 +0000

"Portrait of a Textile Worker" was a large (98" x 100") wall hanging canvas depicting women in a workshop / sweatshop. Unusual that the workroom appears quite tidy - even austere. It depicts textile workers less like frenzied slaves than as lonely, single-purposed drones. I like how the sewing table in the foreground takes up almost the whole lower half of the piece, as was a common of Japanese woodblock prints, and Impressionist paintings (that borrowed the idea from the Japanese); it effectively gives the illusion that the sewing table is engulfing not only its worker, but the room. Did I mention that it's made of 30,000 clothing labels sewn together? Speaking of drones at sewing machines, how many indirectly participated in the creation of this project?

terese-agnew-portrait-of-a-textile-worker-detail

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:45:01 +0000

devorah-sperber-after-the-mona-lisa

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:47:48 +0000

cropped-phrenology-aparatus.jpg

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:12:01 +0000

http://threadforthought.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/cropped-phrenology-aparatus.jpg

cropped-phrenology-aparatus.jpg

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:11:38 +0000

http://threadforthought.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/cropped-phrenology-aparatus.jpg

cropped-phrenology-w-arc.jpg

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:12:42 +0000

http://threadforthought.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/cropped-phrenology-w-arc.jpg

cropped-phrenology-aparatus.jpg

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:13:59 +0000

http://threadforthought.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/cropped-phrenology-aparatus.jpg

kirchner-five-women-in-the-street

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:08:54 +0000

kirchner-berlin-street-scene

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:55:46 +0000

jeanne-paquin-hobble-skirt

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:08:38 +0000

kirchner-potsdamer-platz

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:47:12 +0000

kirchner-potsdamer-platz1

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:48:18 +0000

rosalind-russell-in-1940s-hat

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:53:56 +0000

rosalind-russell-in-1940s-hat1

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:57:43 +0000

kirchner-street-berlin

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:59:22 +0000

kirchner-women-in-the-street

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:12:25 +0000

kirchner-street-berlin1

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:13:09 +0000

kirchner-two-women-in-the-street

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:13:48 +0000

kirchner-street-scene

Tove Hermanson — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:42:06 +0000

duchamp-nude-descending-a-staircase

Tove Hermanson — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:02:53 +0000

Duchamp's "Nude Descending a Staircase"

Kirchner & the Berlin Street

Tove Hermanson — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:31:56 +0000

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="96" caption="Ernst Kirchner self portrait, 1919"][/caption] One of the few advantages of working in midtown is that I am just a couple minutes jaunt away from the MoMA, and every once in awhile, I actually take my full hour lunch break to soak up some visual culture. Yesterday I fought my way through the rainy day museum-attending mob (I believe it's also free admission day) and attended a walking tour delivered by the stunningly beautiful and articulate Galia Fischer on one of my favorite artists, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner and his series of 11 Berlin street scene paintings, created 1913 - 1915 (a period I particularly love in fashion history, especially as it relates to pre-war times). Kirchner is known for his harsh, sweeping vertical lines, violent brushstrokes and dismal color schemes (I say "dismal" adoringly), not to mention his frequent subject of prostitutes (which in the scheme of art history is far from uncommon, but I'll just throw it out there). To begin at the beginning:

"Five Women in the Street" (1913) was the first in Kirchner's street series, and depicts the ladies of the night as birds of paradise (or perhaps a more domestic parrot), posing in their green habitat with green-tinged millinery plumage and greenish skin. The bird comparison is further emphasized by the bulky fur lapels that puff the chest area up, and the hobble skirts -- both of which were popular fashions in the 19-teens -- that coincidentally create bird-like, tapered legs and emphasize pointy feet. [caption id="attachment_27" align="alignright" width="183" caption="Jeanne Paquin - hobble skirt"][/caption] The women peer into what can be assumed to be a storefront on our right (the dark hash marks presumably the glass reflection) window shopping, while it may be inferred that the car sidling close on the left contains a man cruising through his own glass at the bodily merchandise they are displaying and hocking. I really love the complex relationship between Voyeur and The Observed that windows and glass bring up. There are several great essays that deal with this topic in Sexuality & Space, published by the Princeton Press, specifically Beatriz Colomina's "The Split Wall: Domestic Voyeurism" that discusses how architecture and constructed spaces can create nooks, for example, that feel cozy and safe but are actually framed like a stage, displaying rather than concealing. Additionally, there is the layer of interior/domestic spaces being considered inherently feminine. Though I'm delighted that "Five Women," with its plein air ladies and automobile-hidden man, contradicts that convention in one sense, the way Kirchner has framed them hints at a more complex relationship. The women are sandwiched tightly between the car and the window, and they touch the very edges of each side of his painting, suggesting that they're boxed in (within their profession, within their greater role as women, etc.), even within their literal outdoor setting.

"Berlin Street Scene" (1913) has a wider array of colors than many other of Kirchner's street scenes. There are actually visible men in this one, but they are all made rather anonymous by their unvarying blue-black coats and high bowlers. By contrast, the two women become the focus by color alone; though they are half hidden by the two men, the woman in scarlet and her companion in bright blue pop out. The woman-as-bird theme continues with the feathered hats, but this is a male perspective, I think. What's more telling about the closeness of the women's relationship is that their hats match their companion's coats and not their own. This unifies them chromatically and implies their connection within the sea of dusky men, though they look away from each other. As I went through the show, I realized that this was a favorite visual trick of Kirchner's. Galia pointed out that the face of the man we can actually see appears to be almost as grotesquely made up as the women's: he has those smudgy kohl eyes and lips that match the woman in blue's. I like to imagine a little narrative: that those are two johns approaching the prostitutes but as they near, the one on the right turns away in disgust, twisting his body in a most awkward way so you almost can't tell which way his body is facing. But is he repulsed by the hookers (you must admit the one on the left, with mascara actually dribbling down her face, is not looking so appetizing), or himself? Remember this is pre-WWI era, when gender roles -- specifically in Berlin -- were slowly being muddled as men went off to war and women took over their jobs, and by extension their social roles. Though Berlin had (and has) a notoriously gender-experimental population, there seems always to be an underlying fear of feminization (and by extension, castration) fear held by men when ancient gender roles are blurred. This particular man seems to be holding onto the last shreds of his masculinity with the sickly yellow, phallic cigarette dangling from his displeased mouth.

"Potsdamer Platz" (Square) (1914) has a color scheme I love: the chili pepper-red train station dominates the upper register while avacado/lime green streets slice through the lower half of the painting, somehow making even the round island the prostitutes stand on appear pointed. The green seems to be literally reflected in the faces of the women as they stand on their perch (anther bird illusion?), with a healthy smattering of murky beige to soften the total effect of the scene... slightly. [caption id="attachment_32" align="alignright" width="241" caption="Rosalind Russell in 1940s hat"][/caption] The woman on the left is ensconced in severe black, with a flat black hat that was not a popular style (fashion historians, correct me if I'm wrong) at the time; in fact, it more closely resembles hats of the 1940s, another war period. The broad hat becomes a platform from which to drape the oddly straight veil, whose evenly spaced vertical folds create quite a birdcage (that old theme again!) around her head, an effect punctuated by the white plumage atop it all. This ensemble approximates mourning clothes -- the white of the hat feathers and the collar would have been inappropriate for true mourning-wear, but I liked Galia's hypothesis that the prostitute was possibly attempting to elicit sympathy (and clients?!) from this odd costume choice. This, after all, was the first year of WWI and there were increasing numbers of pitiable widows on the streets as husbands, brothers and fathers were killed. The two elongated streetwalkers appear (ironically) stationary as they are surrounded by briskly striding men in black. As with other Kirchner street scenes, the women fill the the frame from top to bottom, this time literally dwarfing the insignificant men portrayed in distorted perspective, 1/3 their size. Interesting that the monumental women seem to be stagnating in a world of men with places to go, trains to catch, etc. Social commentary, hmmm? "Street, Berlin" (1913) has a very different color scheme from the others. The purple dress, flamingo pink street and turquoise background are oddly fresh, if still slightly unnatural, shades. The women's smirking bubblegum pink faces are turned in conspiratorially toward each other's again. A man is in the foreground with and the same size as the hookers for once, and though he leans away with his whole body, looking down and away, his sneaky cane projects from his general crotch area and practically touches the woman on the right. The fleshy path they all stand on parts in a cleft between the two figures and is emphasized with an outline of deeper red. The prostitute in purple's plunging plum coat with the fur lining, not to mention her hand which simultaneously conceals and draws attention to her own groin further drives the sexual context of this painting home. "Women in the Street" (1915) has startling chartreuse background with dark forest green dress and deep blue dress worn by the familiar prostitutes, framed centrally again. A rather effeminate man stands to the right, almost blending with the women, but his trousers peeking from beneath his coat and his bowler hat reveals his true sex. He looks demurely down in the direction of the woman in green's feet while she and her companion stare boldly at us, upsetting traditional viewing gender rules, while calling attention to the viewer's own participation in the voyeuristic game. "Two Women in the Street" (1914) distinguishes itself from the rest of the series in several ways. First, it's a close up, showing only the torsos of the women (who again, dominate the frame). Second, their faces are abstracted and flattened with unnatural striations resembling wood grain in an (uncredited -- apparently Kirchner rejected any suggestion that his work was influenced by anything!) homage to the African art that was flooding Europe at that time; Picasso was similarly inspired in the early stages of his career. Even with this truncated view, the women are unified by their identical postures. And again, the woman in the tangerine coat wears a hat the color of her companion's peacock turquoise coat; their matching lemon yellow collars unify them with pose and color. "Street Scene" (1914) was the final painting in the exhibition. It too contains the now familiar motif of two women wearing hats matching each others' outfits (a little hard to make out in this picture, I think): in this instance, the dusty turquoise with royal blue hat paired with her companion's royal blue coat with turquoise cap. And again, they stand so close, belly to belly, with one elegant leg apiece stretched out in front, one tucked behind, so that they might even be mistaken for one person. I don't have a clear reading on their smirks: do they imply power, or act as protective element? [caption id="attachment_41" align="alignright" width="181" caption="Duchamp's "Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2""][/caption] The men behind them line up so neatly that they resemble a female chorus line, especially with the expertly pointed toes. This is also an obvious reference to chronophotography, the Victorian precursor to moving film recording as we know it, where photographs were taken in quick succession in an effort to capture a subject's movements. These early photos inspired the Futurist art movement and one of my favorite Duchamp paintings, "Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2," and I can see similarity with Busby Berkley's large scale musical numbers from the 1930s involving identically (scantily clad) dancers moving in near synchronization so as to give the illusion they are all connected. Though he is more famous for his dancing girl numbers, there were also large male chorus lines. As with Kirchner's street series, Berkley's dance numbers were highly sexually charged, with scantily clad women opening and closing their arms and legs suggestively; the irony is that Kirchner has once again feminized the men by posturing them thus. Continuing the sexual theme here are the phallic, creamy pink car wheels in the lower right hand corner that touch the actual bottom-- complete with red slit-- of an identically colored pink dog. Lastly, there is a mostly hidden, murky man who I like to imagine is the pimp of these women. He wears a gray suit as opposed to the chorus mens' black attire, and his dusty turquoise hat ties him to the women with color, as they are tied to each other.

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

viktor-rolf-cascading-collar-shirt-fall-2003-rtw

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:01:03 +0000

audrey_hepburn-funny_face

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:12:46 +0000

viktor-rolf-fall-2005-rtw

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:23:52 +0000

Viktor & Rolf Meets Funny Face

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:43:21 +0000

I am a huge fan of the avant garde designers Viktor & Rolf; I remember being introduced to them at an exhibit in the Museum of the City of New York (one of my favorite museums, a neglected gem in Spanish Harlem); the man's style button-down shirt with the waterfall of collars peeling open (shown below) nearly blew my mind. I found out later that the 2003 fashion show this piece came from was inspired by the marvelously eccentric Tilda Swinton. Not only was she the muse for the collection, but in the ultimate runway presentation models were all Swintonized with red, slicked-back hair and whited-out faces with zero eye or lip color (Tilda is famous for going sans makeup, even to award ceremonies): [caption id="attachment_49" align="aligncenter" width="160" caption="Viktor & Rolf - Fall 2003 RTW"][/caption] After that first piece, I blazed through all their collections and visited their fun website which mimics an empty mansion and rides the line between the magical feel of a fairytale castle and the eerie feel of a whodunnit mansion murder mystery a la Clue, Murder By Death, or Gosford Park. I love V&R's oh-so postmodern take on fashion -- poking fun at the ridiculous nature of it, obviously having fun with it (the fashion industry can take itself a bit too seriously, non?), and yet honoring its traditions and motifs, like classic tailoring. Repetition and exaggeration of stylistic staples is a common commentary method for V&R, but check out their other collections, because they are guaranteed to surprise and probably shock season after season.

+

=

FABULOUS

So the news item here is that after Viktor & Rolf announced they wouldn't be showing at Paris Fashion Week, they revealed that their spring 2009 collection will be unveiled online, a brilliant decision that both garners attention in its oddness and democratically disseminates their collection to a wider audience in less time (click here for link to NYTimes On the Runway blog commentary on democratization of fashion). Shalom Harlow (who is one of the few models I can identify by name and find to be more beautiful than grotesque) is to be only model in the show. Now here's what really excites me: the wonderfully cheesy musical "Funny Face" (1957) is to be the show's theme! I happen to be a huge fan of the campy musical genre, but even if you're not, this one is particularly wonderful if you're interested in fashion as a) it's a loose biography of renowned 50s fashion photographer Richard Avedon (Fred Astair plays "Dick Avery"), and b) Edith Head outdoes herself on the costumes. There are some stunning photo shoots with Audrey Hepburn in a classic role of her as an awkward, mousy, bookish beatnik abducted by a fashion editor (played by flamboyant Kay Thompson) and turned into a first class fashion model. These shoots pretty much provide an excuse to dress Audrey in many pretty frocks filmed in stunning Technicolor, but how satisfying is that??

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SWdFyvlPhk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0]

This movie has been recently resurrected by the Gap ads of Audrey dancing in black skinny pants, another gem of a scene that is ironically used to portray her character as distinctly unfashionable. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aERWhyafpik] All this is a lengthy way of saying: I'm very excited to see the marriage of one of my favorite musicals merged with one of my favorite fashion teams. To be released online October 2.

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

balenciaga-fall-08-caped-jacket

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:11:53 +0000

balenciaga-fall-08-caped-jacket-superhero1

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:16:40 +0000

balenciaga-fall-08-caped-jacket

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:16:56 +0000

louise-goldin-fall-08-blue-quilted-geo-dress

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:28:40 +0000

sandinistas-revolution-mask

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:45:35 +0000

kurdistan-mass-grave-w-clothes

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:49:37 +0000

Susan-Meiselas-Kurdistan-clothes-gravestones

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:51:56 +0000

1992 IRAQ. Kurdistan. Koreme Genocide. June 1992. NORTHERN IRAQ. Kurdistan. June 1992. Kurdish men look closely at clothes left on top of graves marking unidentified bones exhumed below. Erbil cemetery.

suit

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:22:21 +0000

the-big-sleep-lauren-bacall

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:27:03 +0000

sarah-palin-beehive

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:43:57 +0000

sarah-palin-ponytail

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:46:04 +0000

bush-kerry-side-by-side

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:00:42 +0000

clintons-cleavage

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:06:28 +0000

hillary-clinton-yellow-suit

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:09:58 +0000

sarah-palin-hair-down

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:11:33 +0000

clintons-cleavage1

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:23:22 +0000

michelle-obama-in-hm

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:56:14 +0000

edouard-halouze-le-messager

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:32:24 +0000

louise-brooks

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:16:24 +0000

louise-brooks1

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:17:21 +0000

ibrooku001p1

louise-brooks2

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:18:40 +0000

ibrooku001p1

louise-brooks

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:21:10 +0000

Art Deco Fashion & Social Commentary

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:41:35 +0000

[caption id="attachment_135" align="aligncenter" width="233" caption="Edouard Halouze's "Le Messager" 1925"][/caption] Yesterday I attended a lecture at the New York Public Library accompanying their current exhibit "Art Deco Design: Rhythm and Verve." There was another lecture on art deco architecture that I attended a few weeks ago, but this one-- "Fashions of the Art Deco Era"-- was tailored for me. Paula Baxter, curator of the exhibit and author of one of my absolute favorite fashion blogs, was the speaker. Though fashion was the focal point, Paula's (and my) interest in the sartorial arts lies in the socio-political and economic climates surrounding fashion, so much of the information disseminated was not strictly clothes-related, but provided a groundwork for why fashion took such a radical turn in the "teen-aughts," as Paula delightfully calls them. This emphasizes the point that nothing is invented or occurs in a vacuum, and all local and often world events exert direct influence upon visual arts, fashion most certainly included. I will relay my notes here, with perhaps a few tangents of my own. Art Deco's lifespan was from 1919 - 1939. Here is a limited time line overlay: 1914-18 WWI 1920 - 19th Amendment grants women suffrage 1923 - Yankee Stadium built 1924 - Native Americans granted US citizenship 1926 - A. A. Milne writes Winnie the Poo 1927 - The Jazz Singer is the first full length talkie 1927 - Charles Lindbergh flies the first non-stop flight from New York to Paris 1929 - stock market crash heralded the Great Depression 1931 - Empire State Building completed (and struggles to procure tenants) 1930s - electric sewing machines widespread (invented in 1889) 1939-41 - WWII [caption id="attachment_139" align="aligncenter" width="235" caption="Louise Brooks' iconic bob c. 1925"][/caption] The end of WWI marked a shocking new era for the world. Women's public roles had increased out of necessity during the war and the overall jublilation of victory translated into a great departure from Edwardian social mores, sexual roles, decorative arts and fashions. Most are familiar with the neck baring bobbed haircut of the 20s, but Paula noted that it was not just a fad, but a scandal-- women had worn long hair for centuries, and cutting a pageboy 'do was like tattoos are today. Many adopt the fashion, but just as many scorn the trend as frivolous or scandalous (many parents among the latter group). As a side note, I sported the Louise Brooks bob (above) for a decade. In painting and "high" art, the Cubist movement had a tremendous impact upon fashion (the Metropolitan Museum presented the compelling evidence marvelously in their 1998-99 exhibit "Cubism and Fashion" in which paintings from the period were juxtaposed with fashion examples side-by-side). Inspired by African sculpture, by painters Paul Cézanne (French, 1839-1906) and Georges Seurat (French, 1859-1891), and by the Fauves, Cubists shattered, analyzed and reassembled the subject matter into abstracted forms. This aesthetic inspired and was adopted by designers of all kinds-- furniture, textile, and fashion, who distilled their own creations to streamlined versions of more ornate, familiar forms of the Edwardian and Victorian ages. Embellishment and ornamentation was more restrained, and dress patterns were reduced to simple shapes (i.e. squares, circles, cylinders, etc.) that were allowed to drape naturally on the body, rather than restrain it with restrictive tailoring. Jazz Increasing acceptability of women playing sports and leading more active lifestyles had great impact on the changing desired physique of the 20s. Silhouettes from the then-recent Edwardian and Victorian ages were highly curvaceous-- if not downright meaty-- with emphasis placed on overflowing bosoms, hips, and buttocks. But the skimpy fashions of the 20s complimented the new emphasis on athletic bodies and narrowed the gap between health and glamour. (As a side note, Paula said yes, skirts were shorter than they had ever been, but even in 1925 when hemlines were at their shortest, they were still 1" below the knee.) Menswear continued the Edwardian penchant for proper, dapper, tailored suits. The new found athleticism made the ideal male figure sleeker than times past, too. Paula emphasized that the Duke of Windsor (the temporary Prince of Wales) had a tremendous influence over men's fashion of his time, disseminating his personal stylistic choices by being the most photographed celebrity of his time. He popularized cuffed trousers and advocated for the switch to the zipper fly from the buttoned version. The zipper took its modern form in 1913 from its more finicky 1893 version which had a tremendous impact on the making of clothes and the act of dressing, but I believe it was the Duke's vocal endorsement of it for easy access to the groin (I'm quite sure that wasn't his exact argument) that caused a sartorial uproar and resistance before ultimate widespread adoption. The 20s was when America's obsession with celebrity fashion and idolization began. With the talkies of the silver screen, images of stars like Clara Bow, Fred Astaire, and Marlene Dietrich were disseminated across the United States and internationally. The film studios invested much in their publicity departments which took tremendous pains to create and present their stars in a flattering light, blurring the lines between personal and private life. The introduction of feasible air transportation with Charles Lindbergh's Spirit of St. Louis flight (see time line above) continued the craze for all things streamlined and aerodynamic, which, again, was translated by designers and disseminated into everyday objects like martini sets and fashion. It also marked the beginning of America's dependence on credit and oil. After the world became choked by the Great Depression with the dawn of the 30s, hemlines dropped to more conservative lows. Flared skirts and an emphasis on waists replaced the straight lines of the 20s, though the ideal female figure continued to be relatively flat, hipless, and generally boyish, a puzzling trend of gender ambiguity that continues to this day. Marlene Dietrich was one of the few who managed to assert her personal style in spite of loud protests from her employers, sporting mannish pantsuits (Hillary's predecessor!) in addition to more conventional slinky gowns. It was only because her sex appeal By the 30s, the widespread usage of the electric sewing machine had resulted in plentiful off-the-rack merchandise. Madeleine Vionnet was credited with inventing draping on the bias, a technique that enables fabric to hang and stretch more naturally over a body rather than dictate a shape. She started a fad of elegant gowns that clung to the necessarily slender forms of the wearers, requiring even less additional accessorizing than the flapper dresses of the previous decade. The menswear silhouette departed similarly from the sleek but narrow to one that emphasized broader shoulders, slim waists, and wider pants legs, a la Clark Gable. With the approaching of WWII and ever more women entering the workforce, gender lines continued to blur. Menswear influenced women's fashion in the 30s with tailoring becoming evermore important to both sexes; women would feminize their skirt suits with ostentatious bows that belied the inherently masculine suits that was appropriate work wear for secretaries, etc.

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

laura-bush-and-cindy-mccain-in-blue

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:42:30 +0000

obama-women-in-blue-at-dnc

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:43:33 +0000

obamas-and-bidens-in-red

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:44:15 +0000

Viktor & Rolf's Online Fashion Show

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:49:17 +0000

An update to my earlier post about the much anticipated V&R online show "Funny Face" (a.k.a. "Shalom"), here is the link to the Spring / Summer 09 show itself: http://www.viktor-rolf.com/index.htm As previously stated, I love me some Viktor & Rolf. Though this was not my favorite show of theirs by far, I still thought they explored some interesting concepts. Repetition: V&R have always loved exaggeration by duplication (their multi-collared shirt, cascading lapel jacket, etc.). They have also incorporated this theme into their runway models before (fall 2003 RTW collection), painting them all with the same dramatic, wan complexion and ginger-red hair of their fabulously eccentric friend and muse Tilda Swinton. Though unusual in the fashion world, this concept was famously used in the 1937 classic Shall We Dance where Fred Astaire, missing his paramour Ginger Rogers, insists that his backup dancers all wear masks with her image. Deliciously creepy, non? [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq0CQdjrA5s] Geometry: I enjoyed V&R's black and white striped pattern, featured in fabric, shoes and tights. It reminded me a bit of England's flag motif:

Ensembles sporting the long, sharply angled lines were set against pieces embracing more organic, flowing shapes where the fabric was cut in waves and allowed to drape in a less structured manner. Interestingly, these softer shapes obscured the body's natural shape even more than the rigidly geometric ones, like a shell hosting a soft snail.

Spirals abounded throughout the collection with various levels of subtly, perhaps referencing seaweed and more snails (the second V&R ensemble below actually resembles a snail's proportions of exterior-to-flesh). Technology: I watched the show several times over the course of several days, and the website's quality was oddly inconsistent. The final time I viewed it, the screen was distractingly grainy -- I don't know if that's because there was a website traffic jam or what, but I had difficulty making out the details. These are the drawbacks of using images rather than live action. However, there were several close-ups of the garments that I appreciated, the details of which never would have been possible from a non-front row seat at a live show. I enjoyed the deliberate liberties that were taken in the filming style -- sometimes the same 2 second image was looped for emphasis, and there were a couple slow motion shots of Shalom striding down the virtual runway. I liked that attention was drawn to this being a video, not even attempting to duplicate a runway video that might've been taken of a live show (there were no virtual audience members either, making it feel a bit like a dress rehearsal rather than a final product-- and perhaps that's what it was in the grand scheme of things). And in case you still missed the digital / technological aspect, the show concluded with all 21 Shaloms applauding as the oversized puppet masters Viktor and Rolf literally lorded over them, watching as the Shaloms' pixels broke down and they disintegrated into virtual space like confetti. All in all, I enjoyed the concept of the "Shalom" show -- democratizing high fashion by presenting on a universally accessible platform and all that rot-- but the designs themselves fell a bit short for me, as did the quality of said technology. I wonder if V&R, or perhaps another fashion house, pursue digital options in showcasing....

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Palin's Beehive and Other Political Fashion Statements

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:42:37 +0000

[caption id="attachment_116" align="aligncenter" width="234" caption="Palin's famous up-do"][/caption]

"There are three things woman politicians get more ink in the press over than males. One is hairdo, two is hemline and the third is their husband, as society tends to be very concerned about these things with women politicians, and we've seen it with Sarah Palin," said Nichola D. Gutgold, associate professor of communication arts and sciences at Penn State Lehigh Valley in Fogelsville. I just read a silly tidbit in New York Magazine, hoisted from a gossip blurb in the New York Daily News: a former co-contestant of the 1984 Miss Alaska beauty pageant claims that Sarah Palin kept her hair cemented in it's do with an entire can of Aqua Net hairspray. "An Alaskan gale wouldn't have moved a hair on her head," the informant Pamela Massey stated. In looking for a picture to attach to this post using the Google search term "Sarah Palin beehive," I discovered a host of sites that have discussed this seemingly frivolous topic at length, including the New York Times! But it this discussion actually superficial? Though I certainly see the silliness in devoting news space to something as seemingly inconsequential as a politician's hairstyle, a woman's hair is still one of the most fetishized aspects of her. Though it often goes unspoken, female politicians have to walk a fine line of presenting themselves as attractive -- because we love a leader who's easy on the eyes -- but not sexy -- because a woman's sexuality is still feared, probably because of the implied power she has upon those attracted to her. And people have strong opinions about Palin's hair: some think it's sleek and modern while others see it as outdated and/or frumpy. But all these adjectives could be -- and I believe actually are -- about Sarah herself. After all, she chose the hairdo and as she's been in both pageants and politics, I'm quite sure she gave considerable thought to her tresses. Likewise, I believe it was a deliberate decision to have her hair in a more casual ponytail beehive variation that allies her with all those ponytailed soccer moms she's trying to win over: [caption id="attachment_117" align="aligncenter" width="197" caption="Palin's Ponytail"][/caption] And here is Palin pre V.P. nominee (I love this!): [caption id="attachment_162" align="aligncenter" width="240" caption="Palin pre-makeover"][/caption] In the Times article her hairdresser (at the aptly named Beehive Salon) reveals that Sarah wanted to look taller on camera, which was a big (haha) issue for shrimpy 5' 11" G. W. Bush when running against John Kerry's 6' 3". (During debates, you could see by the podium that the camera was more zoomed in on Bush so in split screen he filled as much of the frame as Kerry did, because it's well documented that the masses tend to vote for the taller guy. It seems the camera trick worked in this instance.) Curiously, Palin's beehive has since become a popular wig style for orthodox Jewish women. The religious but apolitical Sheitel.com sells the V.P. hopeful's namesake hairpiece in addition to the less currently popular Hillary Clinton wig(!). [caption id="attachment_155" align="aligncenter" width="200" caption="Sarah Palin in Naughty Monkey shoes"][/caption] "For me, the heels are on, the gloves are off," Palin declared at an October rally in an attempt to rescue McCain's precarious campaign. I thought it interesting that she used this sly metaphor to refer to her femininity and political viciousness, especially after she has been criticized (or at least commented upon) for sporting a pair of Naughty Monkey hot red peep-toe pumps the day she was introduced as McCain's running mate. The Naughty Monkey brand is generally marketed to "women in their early to mid-20s who go clubbing," like frequent patron Paris Hilton. Criticism notwithstanding, sales of Naughty Monkey shoes have increased by 50% on Amazon since Palin wore them. This all seems reminiscent of the buzz around Hillary's brightly colored campaign suits, which became such a joke that Hillary eventually poked fun at herself over it. But what was she trying to convey with these vivid pant suits? First, it should be noted that women were not allowed to wear pants on the Senate floor until the early 1990s, and Hillary clearly has been embracing that recent sexist sartorial victory ever since. Second, a well tailored suit is a symbol of -- dare I specify "masculine" -- power, strength, and control, but the bright colors made Hillary's distinctively feminine. They wouldn't have been everyone's hues of choice, but it was a bold stylistic decision and having a consistent, identifiable style is a subtle cue that the person under the clothes is consistent him/herself. Whether this cue is accurate or not is debatable, but the point remains that the wardrobe is a visual extension of what a politician's speeches should be verbalizing. Lastly, being as easily visible as an emergency flare cannot hurt when you're attempting to attract attention in a crowd (or convention, as the case may be). There was also that mini scandal when Hillary showed a little cleavage: [caption id="attachment_124" align="aligncenter" width="190" caption="Clinton's Supposed Cleavage"][/caption] The Clinton campaign rightly responded "Frankly, focusing on women’s bodies instead of their ideas is insulting." I personally find it pretty hilarious that that amount of chest was even called "cleavage," but Clinton is known for being hyper-conservative (when it comes to revealing flesh), so I suppose within that context, her exposed chest plate was mildly shocking. Mildly. It strikes me as telling that where Palin seems to be vamping her sex appeal -- if ever-so-slightly -- with her pencil skirts and red heels, Clinton seems to use her clothes to detract attention from her feminine form, obscuring her curves under her male-inspired pantsuits. [caption id="attachment_129" align="aligncenter" width="128" caption="Michelle Obama in H&M"][/caption] This kind of fashion scrutiny falls upon politicians' spouses too. It was noted in New York Magazine that Michelle Obama has been seen wearing the highly "democratic" (i.e. "affordable") H&M off-the-rack merchandise, which was clearly not a coincidence since Michelle has reportedly "shied away from appearing in luxury fashion magazines because she doesn't want to be photographed in outlandishly priced outfits. She also insisted on wearing her own clothes for her October More cover.... Her sartorial choice was likely made in keeping with the current economic spirit as many might not find it prudent for our potential First Ladies to run around in designer outfits that cost $313,000." This not-so-random price tag was an editorial jab at Cindy McCain and Laura Bush's expensive ensembles during a public appearance at the RNC, a story which was originally published in Vanity Fair's Politics & Power blog. And the L.A. Times quoted trend forecaster Tom Julian, "And she [Palin] should definitely not take her fashion cues from Cindy McCain who is a totally couture, 7th Avenue fashion plate. Perhaps a line like American designer Ralph Lauren would answer all Gov. Palin’s needs." Palin, Hillary and Michelle are not the first politicians to be at the center of fashion buzz. A century ago, rimless, round pince-nez frames with the neck cord became iconic when President Theodore Roosevelt wore them. And that was without the help of Google to identify the brand and a place to purchase them. [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="230" caption="Theodore Roosevelt, forgotten eyewear icon"][/caption] From President Eisenhower's waist-length military jackets to first lady Jacqueline Kennedy's pillbox hats, people in politics have long influenced consumer behavior. A mere day after Michelle Obama appeared on The Tonight Show and revealed to Jay Leno that her outfit was from J. Crew (amid the $150,000 Palin wardrobe controversy no less!), J. Crew's stores had been swept bare of the various garments, purchased by hungry consumers. The only items of Sarah Palin's wardrobe the middle class can afford are her glasses, and perhaps shoes. Even if you are completely uninterested in fashion for the aesthetics, the question still must be raised: what kind of a message is being sent by a politician who dresses in six-digit designer clothes that his/her desired constituents -- the middle class -- can never afford? Further reading:

"The Politics of Fashion," Harper's Bazaar 2/08
"Politics 1st Ladies of Fashion..." Freep.com 10/9/08
Photo time lines of recent political looks of
- bespectacled Sarah Palin,
- coutured Cindy McCain,
- patterned Michelle Obama, and
- pantsuited Hillary Clinton.
"Political Ties" Newsweek 10/14/08
"Sarah Palin Has a Secret Team of Stylists" New York Magazine 9/17/08
"Fashion in Politics Remains a Tricky Business" STLToday 10/25/08
"Outfitting a Candidate" slideshow of Palin's looks, New York Times Magazine 10/23/08
"Classic Campaign Chic" slideshow of the clothes of hopefuls and their families, New York Daily News 10/7/08
"Judging a candidate by his wife's fashion" Financial Times, 11/1/08

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

palin-in-naughty-monkey-shoes

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:20:00 +0000

palin-pre-vp-nomination

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:23:31 +0000

Chanel's Silent Movie

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:12:48 +0000

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lipRf1xELuk]

I've probably watched more silent movies than many of my peers (and possibly my peers' parents, for that matter), and though I very much enjoyed the concept and spirit of Lagerfeld's homage to Chanel, something was off. There was the flickering "film," the hazy Holga-esqe framing, the deliberately choppy frames, ruby-lipped (and sometimes mustachioed) men with wildly rolling eyes... but something was off, and it wasn't just the too-long hair. I realized that it was the women themselves that gave it away as a (mini) period piece and not authentic. They are all just so pointy. The standard of beauty for women of the 20s was thin (for the first time since the end of the 18th century), it's true. But they were athletic, not emaciated. They had small breasts and hips, but their thighs touched, and more readily visible were their rounded faces and sloping jawlines. [caption id="attachment_269" align="aligncenter" width="233" caption="Louise Brooks, star of the silent screen. She's petite but not scrawny."][/caption] [caption id="attachment_270" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Dorothy Sebastian, Joan Crawford and Anita Page in "Our Dancing Daughters" (1928). Note the rounded faces."][/caption] Today's models, as exemplified by Lagerfeld's mini movie, are angular, gaunt, severe beauties of a different time. I'm not saying everything else about the short was historically accurate by any means, but I thought it interesting that the very people (specifically women) used to portray a bygone era actually give it away, even ignoring the more technical inaccuracies.

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

From Fetish Object to Object of Discontentment

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:50:44 +0000

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RFH7C3vkK4]

News about Muntader al-Zaidi, the Iraqi reporter who threw his shoes at Bush during a press conference this week, has traveled quickly to alternating responses of horror and glee. The NYTimes reported that "Calling someone the "son of a shoe" is one of the worst insults in Iraq," adding a new spin to what was already an obviously angry, insulting gesture. This bold action has added yet another symbolic meaning to the humble shoe: that of irate protest, against American troops in Iraq, specifically. "In the Baghdad neighborhood of Sadr City, people calling for an immediate American withdrawal removed their footwear and placed the shoes and sandals at the end of long poles, waving them high in the air. And in the southern Iraqi city of Najaf, people threw their shoes at a passing American convoy." Some Iraqis said these protests were a direct result of the democracy advocated by America. Ah, sweet sloppy irony. In searching for a picture of a pile of shoes to include with this post, I was reminded that shoes have historically not only embodied fetishistic sexuality, but also bitter oppression. Concentration camps like Auschwitz hoarded heaps of shoes of their Jewish victims. Shoes were also. valuable bartering merchandise in concentration camps. [caption id="attachment_275" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Shoe pile at Auschwitz"][/caption] By the way, $10 million has been offered to purchase the original infamous pair of black dress shoes. Consumeristic democracy in action!

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Obama's Bullet-Proof Suit

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:59:05 +0000

Over drinks last week, my friend George mentioned he (in addition to many other Americans, I'm sure) was terrified Obama was going to get shot walking down Pennsylvania Ave on Inauguration Day. This opened a discussion about bulletproof clothes-- I'd seen a TV documentary or something on a Colombian company that specialized in bulletproof leather jackets (and possibly other "casual" clothes -- it was many years ago I saw it). And what do you know, not only was someone else afraid of the same assassination, but someone had the same foresight that I did! Apparently Obama strolled down his new street in a totally dashing, Colombian-constructed bullet resistant suit (I suppose the expression "bulletproof" could bring on lawsuits if it failed). I immediately sent George a link to the news and wondered if Obama were deliberately shot in in a demo suit beforehand. More likely he witnessed a demo of one of those Colombian factory workers (I love the accompanying photo) getting shot at. [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="250" caption="Obama on Inauguration Day, 2009"][/caption] "The suit, possibly by Colombian designer Miguel Caballero, could in theory stop a 9MM. This type of clothing has three levels of bullet-proofness, and, if indeed Obama was wearing a Caballero design, we imagine it was the top-tier one. Sharply dressed and can dodge bullets?" ~New York Magazine Further reading: "President Obama Wears Bullet-Resistant Suit at Ingaurual" Wired.com, 1/21/09

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Free Prom Dress Charities

Tove Hermanson — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:53:22 +0000

Always a fan of reusing / redistributing clothes, I was delighted to read about Project Bridesmaids. Sponsored by Modern Bride Magazine and in conjunction with Project Hope, women were encouraged to donate their lightly worn bridesmaid dresses (jokes of the unwearability of these single serving dresses need not exist!) and formal gowns. Several hundred dresses were collected this year, which were displayed in NYC's Hammerstein Ballroom on March 7 (in addition to a few other U.S. cities), available for redistribution to Harlem girls for their prom nights.

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="445" caption="Nikkita McPherson found the ideal dress"][/caption] Growing up in the astoundingly liberal Cambridge, MA public school system, my own prom was less of a life altering, date stressing fin de siecle and more of an amusing anomaly as a school-sponsored party in a hotel -- an opportunity to hang out with friends in a different location, really. But as someone who likes to dress up, I certainly appreciated the opportunity to flounce around in fancy gear, and I wish every high schooler who wants to participate in prom to be able to prance in something that elevates his/her self esteem, regardless of limited capital. Prom should be an opportunity for teenagers to play a little exploratory dress-up (an important game, I think), donning clothes they imagine adults wear on nights on the town -- even if adults who wear prom-like dresses are probably only found in soap operas. The website DonateMyDress.org helps you find other similar initiatives locally that I encourage you and your friends to donate your own gowns to. Related article: "So Long, Bridesmaid; Hello, Prom Queen," NYTimes March 7, 2009

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

A Young Dandy

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:53:46 +0000

Photos of second grader Arlo Weiner have been circulating around the fashion blogosphere. The son of Matt Weiner -- creator of the awesomely written, amazingly art directed 1960s period TV series Mad Men -- has adopted his very own eclectic, elegant style. Referencing many influences and periods he never experienced personally, this 8-year-old shows a creative flair for dress that is both daring and inspiring. Some fun facts about Milo:

He requested a top hat at age 3 (I myself was an ancient 29 when I got my vintage pop-out top hat).
He loves ascots (who doesn't?).
He likes to mix and match patterns and stripes.

Allow me to share some of my favorite Arlo ensembles:

Doesn't he look like he's going off to the office in a newsroom?

[caption id="attachment_351" align="aligncenter" width="214" caption="Cary Grant as a spineless (but hilarious) reporter in His Girl Friday (1940)"][/caption]

This one reminds me of the Mad Hatter costume I wore last Halloween (I wore my own vintage pop-up hat):

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="196" caption="the Mad Hatter, Sir John Tenniel's illustration of Alice in Wonderland"][/caption]

I love red on red on red too:

I call this outfit Arlo's 1890s inspired steampunk look:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="204" caption="Steampunk woman with goggles and cane"][/caption]

Arlo admits most of his ties are clip-ons which I cannot condone, though considering his youth I suppose I'll let it slide. (Friends know I'm a tie snob all around -- I only wear full Windsors myself.) I've joked for years about how my children are going to hate me for the suits and sailor outfits I'll put them in; it's comforting to know there are actually young people who choose to wear what many adults would consider outlandish. It gives me such joy to know there are parents who don't shove Baby GAP down their childrens' throats. Arlo reminded me that children are inherently creative, exploring a world they have not grasped all the rules of yet, perhaps giving them greater breadth of imagination than many adults, as they find what's pleasing to themselves and not what they've been told is cool or fashionable or trendy. Flashback to my own youth: I was raised on yard sales and hand-me-downs, which, being a child of the opulent, label conscious and snobbish 80's, I lamented and resented daily. Seriously, I cried almost every morning as my mother forced me into layers of distinctly unattractive turtlenecks, stretched out tights held up by belts, and courderoys that were the antithesis of then-cool shiny spandex leggings (courderoys, that is, only on gym days at school -- I was only allowed to wear skirts and dresses the rest of the days. And I attended public school!). But my mom redeemed herself at playtime. In the back hall we had a dress-up box (that grew over the years) filled with random flea market finds like reams of fabric and lace, tutus, hats, and clothes of all sorts that were either not in good enough shape to wear in "real life," or were too big, or just too crazy. But my friends and I could entertain ourselves for hours with the contents of those boxes, wrapping the cloth around ourselves and assuming exotic identities, exploring the roles we might or might not actually appropriate later in life. And even though I now live in one of the fashion capitals of the world, I'm economically independent and can wear whatever I damn please, I actually choose to shop at secondhand and thrift shops still. And instead of waiting for the weekend to play in my dress-up box, I play dress-up every day, allowing my mood and creativity (not fleeting trends) to dictate what facet of my personality I choose to display. I hope young Arlo's passion for dress brings him as much pleasure as mine continues to for me.

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Julia-tomyshenko-vladimir-putin

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:14:43 +0000

julia-tomyshenko-dec-26-2004

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:15:51 +0000

julia-tomyshenko-eu-headquarters-jan-28-2007

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:17:23 +0000

yulia-tomyshenko-sept-26-2008

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:38:08 +0000

1550s_unknown_portrait

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:12:25 +0000

Portrait by Unknown Artist, c. 1550

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:13:25 +0000

A Daringly Stylish Politician!

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:19:52 +0000

I am embarrassed to say I failed the Huffington Post test on guessing who Yulia Tymoshenko when presented with a collection of photos of her. For all you fellow dunces, she is the Prime Minister of the Ukraine-- and the first female Prime Minister the Ukraine has had. (My ignorance was especially embarrassing to me because my sister in-law is from neighboring Moldova and I like to pretend that I know what's going on in that part of the world). She has made the (some say suspect) switch from millionaire oligarch to revolution leader and has ranked as one of the most powerful women in the world by Forbes twice. What made the online identification game so challenging is that the accomplished Yulia is an interesting -- even daring -- dresser. If you scroll through the photo gallery, you'll see Ms. Tymoshenko accompanying everyone from Vladimir Putin to Viktor Zubkov to a "British heavy metal singer" Sean Carr, and in what clothes! Some choice selections below. Doesn't she look like a fierce 16th century warrior princess?? But with sleek 3/4 length skirt (that hugs her curves beautifully, I might add). [caption id="attachment_176" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Yulia Tomyshenko & Vladimir Putin"][/caption] [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="226" caption=""Portrait of a Married Woman" by Anthonis Mor, 1554 "][/caption]

And how sporty is she in her NASCAR-esque turtleneck? The distinctly unsubtle word "revolution" running the length of her arms like DO NOT CROSS police tape is, I assume, reference to her leadership of the Orange Revolution during which, Wikipedia tells me, she was dubbed the "Joan of Arc of the Revolution." Like a racecar driver, she is advertising her "sponsor" the Orange Revolution in her attire.

[caption id="attachment_177" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Yulia Tomyshenko in Kiev on 12/26/04"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_341" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="NASCAR driver Tony Stewart sporting his (coincidentally orange) sponsor's logo"][/caption] I love this one -- the close fitting beige gives the shocking illusion of nudity, her breasts barely contained by the skimpy bustier portion. And yet in cut it's quite conservative, with every inch of her covered by the turtleneck and pleated skirt. As a side note, I favor a similar style in my own life -- both the body hugging-but-covering-naughty-bits-drapery... and also bustiers. ;-) [caption id="attachment_178" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Yulia Tomyshenko at EU headquarters, 1/28/07"][/caption]

First, I have to comment on how goddamn adorable Yulia looks here. She smiles with abandon, looking sincere and actually happy, a sentiment that is not always carried off by smiling politicians who may look false, strained, or smarmy. Clearly the woman loves rockin' the uni-color ensemble, which -- again -- I'm fond of. The poofy bicep bells offer some frivolity in an otherwise austere white sweater-turtleneck combo. The brooch also reminds me of 16th century jewelry -- pearls were a favorite gem of both Elizabeth I and Henry VIII, who had many garments with them sewn in the cloth (and even in Elizabeth's hair).

[caption id="attachment_179" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Yulia Tomyshenko on 9/26/08"][/caption] [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="179" caption="Elizabeth I"][/caption] The woman knows what she likes -- and she likes high collars that are simultaneously severe and decorative. Yulia returns to 16th century fashions, very much in the male "Spanish style" -- that is, mostly black -- like Philip II of Spain (1527 - 1598). [caption id="attachment_335" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Yulia Tymoshenko c. 2006"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_337" align="aligncenter" width="298" caption="Philip II of Spain"][/caption]

She is unquestionably feminine with her up-do and her penchant for figure hugging clothes, but the embellishments Yulia favors are almost always masculine (if dated ideals of masculinity, such as ruffled shirts), externalizing what must be a daily struggle: being a female politician in the male dominated world of politics. The ruffled shirt has most recently been a Victorian trend (big surprise with Yulia!), but has earlier roots in 18th century menswear.

[caption id="attachment_336" align="aligncenter" width="214" caption="Yulia Tymoshenko during Orange Revolution corruption scandal"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_338" align="aligncenter" width="226" caption=""Portrait of a Victorian Woman in White" by William de Leftwich Dodge, 1891"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_339" align="aligncenter" width="225" caption="portrait by Alexis N. S. Belle, 18th century"][/caption] And here again, Yulia plays with conservative, traditional dress motifs. The lace -- a fabric with a strong luxury tradition but a current association perhaps more of old ladies -- is here turned from a subtle embellishment to grand statement motif. The rest of the outfit tempers the tattoo-like boldness of the lace with its neutral gray 3/4 length suit-like fit, paired with the familiar high, prim neckline, and feminine bubble sleeves. This outfit was aptly deemed "strict but sexy" by the Komsomolska Pravda newspaper. [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="280" caption="Yulia Tymoshenko on 2/4/06, when she received the record number of votes as the prime minister"][/caption] Ms. Tomyshenko proves that you can be taken seriously as a political figure (I write this without intricate knowledge of her policies, but I'm assuming enough took her seriously to get her elected) in creative dress. I love that she incorporates the traditional folksy milkmaid plaited braid, juxtaposed with her otherwise very modern sartorial sensibility, with nods to history. Supposedly her coiffure was an homage to Lesya Ukrainka, one of the Ukraine's foremost poets from the late 19th, early 20th centuries. I enjoy the way she embraces the presentation of her femininity too, with her figure hugging clothes and stylized long hair (a far cry from the chopped Hilary Clintons and Nancy Pelosis); one could argue that Yulia's interest in fashion in and of itself is an unapologetic display of a passion typically associated with women, which she clearly revels in. I am heartened to have my belief confirmed that having fun with one's wardrobe does not automatically make a woman frivolous, as many still think (none who read this blog, I trust!).

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

duck-tape-prom-black-and-red

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:48:28 +0000

duck-tape-prom-cowboys

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:49:02 +0000

duck-tape-prom-nerdy-dandy

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:50:13 +0000

duck-tape-prom-patriotic

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:50:32 +0000

duck-tape-prom-rainbow

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:50:55 +0000

duck-tape-prom-sci-fi

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:51:13 +0000

duck-tape-prom-flapper-bird

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:56:52 +0000

Duct Tape as a Textile

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:05:27 +0000

New York Magazine brought an annual event to my attention I had no idea existed, but I wish I had in high school: namely, a Duck Tape "Stuck at Prom" contest. Costumes were judged based on workmanship (30%), originality (30%), use of colors (15%, accessories (15%), and quantity of Duck Tape used (10%). In addition to my well documented love of clothes and the relationship between technology and fashion, it just so happens that I've recently become obsessed with duct tape crafty things. My sister recently gave me a duct tape wallet (at my request), and I intend to fashion myself a duct tape DIY dress form in the near future, so I'm all about exploring the wonders of this durable, malleable, industrial material. The other aspect here is clearly The Prom. As I mentioned in a previous post, proms can seem silly and superficial at best, and an excuse for insecure teens to exclude at worst. However, I believe this much hyped event has the redeeming quality of allowing teenagers about to enter an important new phase of life-- adulthood-- to explore the implications of this change sartorially. Somewhat ironically, this contest's textile restrictions promote more whimsical, thematic, youthful looks rather than grownup ones, but it certainly encourages creativity and stresses fun in dress, and in my estimation, that is equally valuable. As a side note, I was pleased to see that though contestants must enter as a pair, mixed (i.e. heterosexual) couples were not required for entry. Though I didn't see any flaming gay couples, I was happy to know they were not explicitly excluded. Here are some of my favorite contestants: Hello pimpin' goth pinstripes! Those must've taken forever to apply! How can you not love the nerdy dapper Duck Tape dandy?? Though I think patriotic clothes are almost always distasteful, I was amused that the center "A" in "Obama" is a tiny White House: I am so impressed this guy agreed to the bird theme: Commitment to a weather motif-- they were clearly looking to score high on the color segment: It's mildly amazing to me that this guy found a girl who was into the sci-fi theme at this tender, unassured age: On the flip side, I was not such a fan of the beige, brown and turquoise cowboy prom look, for many reasons:

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

smoking

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:33:48 +0000

twirling-in-times-square

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:35:16 +0000

arlo-weiner-fedora

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:57:02 +0000

arlo-weiner-mad-hatter

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:57:45 +0000

arlo-weiner-red-velvet

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:58:12 +0000

arlo-weiner-steampunk

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:58:30 +0000

phrenology-and-thread.jpg' doesn't exist?

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:02:14 +0000

http://threadforthought.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/phrenology-and-thread.jpg' doesn't exist?

File 'File 'cropped-phrenology-and-thread1.jpg' doesn't exist?' doesn't exist?

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:44:33 +0000

http://threadforthought.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/File 'File 'cropped-phrenology-and-thread1.jpg' doesn't exist?' doesn't exist?

cropped-phrenology-and-thread-w-strand.jpg

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:46:13 +0000

http://threadforthought.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/cropped-phrenology-and-thread-w-strand.jpg

yulia_tymosheko1

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:48:27 +0000

vr-header1

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:49:37 +0000

vr-geometry1

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:56:56 +0000

vr-ruffles

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:00:46 +0000

vr-ruffled-neckline2

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:08:29 +0000

vr-spiral-dress

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:11:35 +0000

vr-finale

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:40:40 +0000

louise_brooks_naked

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:22:39 +0000

dorothy-sebastian-joan-crawford-and-anita-page

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:30:53 +0000

shoes-at-auschwitz

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:21:08 +0000

iranian-model

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:54 +0000

louise-golden-fall-08

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:06:43 +0000

tron

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:12:54 +0000

utilikilt-black

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:28:13 +0000

utilikilt-denim

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:28:40 +0000

utilikilt-highschooler

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:29:03 +0000

utilikilt-olive

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:39:29 +0000

utilikilt-punk

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:39:50 +0000

utilikilt-workman

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:40:13 +0000

victorian-mourning-earrings

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:43:22 +0000

yulia-tymoshenko-high-collar

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:51:53 +0000

yulia-tymoshenko-cravat

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:54:17 +0000

philip-ii

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:01:13 +0000

victorian-woman

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:41:16 +0000

18th-century-ruffled-shirt-portrait

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:45:32 +0000

tony-stewart-nascar-driver

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:32:21 +0000

reporter-the-philadelphia-story

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:09:10 +0000

white-snail

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:05:30 +0000

victorian-hair-jewelry

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:34:49 +0000

Hair jewelry: hair of a beloved or deceased was often intricately woven into "chains" and "beads."

victorian-widows

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:55:45 +0000

tearing-kriah-sculpture

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:36:46 +0000

ripping-kriah

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:55:31 +0000

Silk Stockings & Russian Communism

Tove Hermanson — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:08:43 +0000

I watched about half an hour of Silk Stockings (1957), a cheesy musical remake of the Greta Garbo classic Ninotchka (1939) where the cool and efficient Soviet employee Cyd Charisse falls in love with Fred Astaire's flamboyant American producer character while on a relatively inconsequential (plot speaking) mission. Even with my passion for cheesy musicals, even I could not wade through the entire film, so bad was the dialogue and music. But before turning it off, I did have the pleasure of seeing the namesake silk stocking dance solo performed by Ms. Charisse. She It's a wistful number reminiscent of other more famous musical movies scenes like frumpy Audrey Hepburn singing in How Long Has This Been Going On? while wistfully dancing around in an ostentatious hat left over by the fashion photo shoot she's been forced into participating in in Funny Face (from 1957 as well):

Or Anne Margaret's How Lovely to be a Woman in Bye Bye Birdie (1963)

Nathalie Wood in West Side Story (1961) singing and dancing in the dress shop where she works:

You'll notice that all these were filmed in the late 1950s -- the decade of hyper feminity in silouettes-- and early 1960s -- the decade when sexuality and gender roles were being questioned more openly. What differentiates Silk Stockings from the other scenes I mentioned is the heavy political overtones: though a love story, it's also about a Commie Russian woman resisting capitalistic inclinations and is ultimately seduced by the capitalistic clothes. The number opens with Cyd Charisse seated next to a framed Lenin photo and we watch as she slowly discards her drab green dress (it's supposed to be drab, though I think it's quite lovely in its simplicity), black tights and sensible shoes for sheet silk stockings, lace neglige and white sparkly mules. Silly perhaps, but I struggle with my collector's / pack rat's urges to accumulate (not the least of my obsessions is clothes), and political / social ideology, which is opposed the stockpiling and hoarding tendencies Americans are told is there right -- and more than that, a measure of sucess in obtaining the capitalist dream.

widow2

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:20:11 +0000

funeral attire

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:51:29 +0000

Mourning Costumes and Religion

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:26:16 +0000

[caption id="attachment_372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Tearing "Kriah", 1996, welded iron. By Orna Ben-Ami"][/caption] A couple months ago I had the unfortunate task of attending the funeral of my former coworker's 20 year-old daughter who tragically died -- of all unlikely things in a developed country -- during childbirth. In dressing for the funeral, I selected a lovely black taffeta dress with an outer layer of sheer black tulle with long tulle sleeves. In spite of its beauty (it's a Lilith sample my friend, a former employee of that Parisian label, gave me), I actually don't wear it very frequently because it's a lot of black and I think it makes a morbid statement, especially paired with my pale skin; however this quality made it ideal for my sad errand.

[caption id="attachment_399" align="aligncenter" width="223" caption="my funeral garb"][/caption] As I was putting the finishing touches on my toilette -- I accessorized with a dripping black tasseled necklace -- my lover asked if I really wanted to be so fancy. "Of course," I replied, "it's a funeral. You're supposed to dress up to show your respect." Though I had to leave at that moment, we resumed the conversation later. My Man is accustomed to Jewish traditions including the kriah (or keriah) where mourners tear a rent in their clothes which they display for the 7 days of shiva, the intense mourning period following a death. The specific placement of this tear is determined by the relationship with the deceased: for a parent, the visible rip is on or near the heart; for siblings, children and spouses, the rip is on the right and need not actually be visible. Children of the deceased are not allowed to ever mend the tears they make, even when shiva has ended, whereas all other mourners may patch the holes after shoshim, the 30 days following a death. Straight away, a hierarchy of relationships is established by the clothes. That of the parent and child is given precedence -- even over spouses -- in a stylized demonstration of respect and perhaps obligation more than an implied closeness of personal relationship, which I found interesting. Kriah is traditionally ripped while standing (to show strength in a time of grief) and the following blessing is recited: Barukh atah Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha'olam dayan ha'emet. Translation: "Blessed are You, Adonai Our God, Ruler of the Universe, the True Judge." [caption id="attachment_374" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="tearing kriah"][/caption] Nowadays, a torn kriah ribbon is sometimes substituted for an actual tear in mourners' clothes: [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="150" caption="kriah ribbon "][/caption] The Biblical roots of the kriah include when Jacob believed his son Joseph was dead and he tore his garments (Genesis 37:34). Likewise, in II Samuel 1:11 King David and all his men rent their clothes upon hearing of the death of Saul and Jonathan. Job, too, in grieving for his children, stood up and rent his clothes (Job 1:20). The kriah is a visual representation of the tear in the hearts and lives of the bereaved, or alternately, a vent to release their feelings. It also signifies that it is only the outer garment (representing the body) that has been torn; the soul of the deceased and the love that the deceased and the mourners have for each other endures. Furthermore, vanity in times of mourning is viewed as disrespectful -- the bereaved should be focused on internal, soulful emotions and not outward public appearance. To this end, bathing, changing clothes, haircuts and nail clipping are also suspended, and to avoid temptation of pride, mirrors are covered. The final rule of self-presentation during shiva (which also applies for Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement) is that leather shoes may not be worn. I was initially perplexed (as were several Jewish friends I asked, and many many people on the internet) as to the reasoning behind the ban on leather shoes in times of mourning. I understand that going without shoes is a powerful display of the rejection of physical comfort, but why would leather be specified? Sneakers, flip-flops or Crocs would circumvent the no-leather shoes rule but wouldn't make sense if shunning comfort were the sole object (tee hee). Have no fear, Reader on the edge of your seat -- I did find a plausible explanation. First (and unsurprisingly), foregoing leather shoes to show deference has roots in the Torah: Moses removed his leather shoes (or sandals, as the case probably was) to approach the burning bush (Exodus 3:5), Joshua did as well when he faced the angel at the Promised Land (Joshua 5:15), and Ezekiel was commanded to remove his shoes while in mourning (Ezekiel 24:17). In these cases, the object was to show deference to God, but during shiva I imagine that that reverence is transferred to the departed. These were not demonstrations of deliberate discomfort so much as those of humility. A secondary explanation is that leather used to be far more of a luxury item than it is today (though there are clearly still traces of this high end market remaining). Leather shoes, then, fell into the category of jewelry and general adornment too ostentatious for times of ritualistic despair. The third reason for the leather shoes ban is one of sensitivity. “This is a day that we are not to practice violence and to look for compassion in life,” says Rabbi Jay Rosenbaum of the Herzl-Ner Tamid Conservative Congregation. “But to get the leather that would be used to make shoes would mean killing one of God’s creatures." [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="439" caption="Ultra-orthodox Jewish men pray as they gather for the mourning ritual of Tisha B'Av -- when Jews mourn the destruction of the biblical temples -- at the Western Wall in Jerusalem's Old City, August 10, 2008. Note the cloth shoes."][/caption] For Jews, distressing their appearance is a physical manifestation their distressed emotional states, which I find perfectly poignant, though it runs contrary to the Christian practices and ideologies I was familiar with before writing this post. I was brought up Episcopalian (the WASP version of Catholic, if you don't know), and had a very different set of rituals surrounding death and mourning. A particularly complex and rigid set of rules and customs were solidified during the Victorian era, which I'll concentrate on for no better reason than that period especially interests me. After the death of Prince Albert in 1861, the devastated Queen Victoria decreed a 40 year mourning period that was to be observed by all in an elaborate and conspicuous manner. The dress codes relating to the royal death trickled down and were adopted by the church, to be followed for all (Christian) deaths. Dark, somber clothes were demanded by all affected by the death. Widows endured the most elaborate dress rules and for the longest period of time. They were to wear black dresses made of crepe (a dull, lusterless material) with black caps which were generally in a toned down version of the current style. Topping the costumes were long "weeping veils" which were sheer crepe or silk. All widows' accessories were black as well, including parasols, gloves, and stockings; undergarments were exempt only because color-fast dyes had not yet been perfected and black would rub off on wearers' bodies. "Full mourning" lasted a year and one day for widows, after which they could graduate -- slowly -- to lighter, brighter colors, but only by prescribed degrees. Grays and deep purples were acceptable in "half mourning," and after 2 years or so a normal, fashionable pallet was once again acceptable. Additionally, widows were not to participate in society -- that is, balls, social gatherings, and essentially any public event except church -- for 3 months, after which they could go out in public but only in full mourning garb. When a widow appeared in fashionable colors again, it was essentially an announcement to the community that she was available for courting and remarriage, which was usually a financial necessity. Scarlett O'Hara famously flaunted this tradition in the Gone with the Wind (1939) dancing scene where she flouts propriety, not by her clothes (which she complains loudly about but wears) but by dancing publicly, an act of frivolity distinctly unbecoming of a widow. At the ball, having accepted the inappropriate dancing invitation of Rhet Butler: Rhet: "We've sort of shocked the Confederacy, Scarlet." Scarlett: "It's a little bit like blockade running, isn't it?" Rhet: "It's worse!" Here is a not-very-good clip, but even muted (which I suggest), you can practically hear the gasp of the shocked ball attendees when Rhet publicly bids for a dance with supposedly grieving Scarlett -- and her Aunt Pitty actually faints! Fast-forward to 1:30:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YL4McnvwZz0&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0]

Here is a properly dressed widow, accessories and all: [caption id="attachment_397" align="aligncenter" width="274" caption="Maria Dennis (1842-1917) wearing "widow's weeds" headgear "][/caption] Christians, like Jews, downplay personal adornment while mourning, though not as completely. Jewelry may be worn, but it must be dark and possess little or no sheen. Several unusual materials became popular during the 19th century due to their possession of these qualities. The hair of a beloved or recently deceased was often intricately woven into "chains" and "beads" to be worn by the bereaved: [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="hair jewelry"][/caption] Queen Victoria's obsession with the public mourning of Prince Albert resulted in a great demand for fashionable and affordable black jewelry, and jet became a popular material for jewelry and buttons. It is an incredibly dense, dark mineraloid derived from decaying wood, appropriately enough. It has been imbued with a religious significance too, as it is a traditional material for monks' rosaries. Queen Victoria sported and popularized Whitby jet, which initially created a boom in the industry but hampered its long term usage as people associated the stone with death. Vulcanite was another material of similar properties commonly used for mourning jewelry. [caption id="attachment_333" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="jet earrings"][/caption] Compare the left shiny buttons below, suitable for everyday wear, to the matte version on the right, acceptable for mourning: [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="176" caption="buttons"][/caption] As in the Jewish custom, levels of Victorian observance were determined by relationship to the deceased, but this was marked more by length of time in mourning dress than by placement of a mourning emblem. Grieving men initially wore simple black suits and black armbands. Servants wore black armbands, as could men who were obliged to wear military uniforms. Children usually wore white with black trim in summer and gray with black trim in winter; they were to observe full mourning for 9 months and half mourning for 3 more (this was the same timeframe parents followed). Siblings observed full and half mourning for 3 months each. Unlike Jews who place the heaviest mourning obligation on surviving children, (Victorian) Christians emphasize the spousal relationship by cloaking the widow in the most elaborate costume and for the longest period of time, that is synced with her ultimate marital / sexual availability.

You can see that though the Victorians had strict rules regarding color (or lack thereof), materials, and textures / sheen, mourning clothes could still be decorative, a major departure from the Jewish tradition. Some of the differences may be related to the belief or disbelief in an afterlife. Christians, though grieving for their own losses, are supposed to rejoice that their loved ones have passed from this mortal world to the next heavenly one. Jews have no such idealistic post-death haven to temper their sorrow, so it follows that the mourning dress should be plainer. Relating to this theory is another Jewish tradition pertaining to the attire of the deceased themselves. After being washed, the body is dressed in tachrichim, hand sewn linen clothes. There are no pockets, as Jews believe we take nothing with us when we die, and everyone buried in identical robes symbolizes that all people are equal (this is reinforced by identical, plain pine caskets). I love how costume has been utilized as a mourning tool in such different ways. I think there's something very beautiful and appealing about both sets of rituals: they are both intended to demonstrate respect for the dead, comfort those left behind, and eventually assist the bereaved to return to normal life. Silly or excessive as either may seem, don't we all crave those things in trying times?

************************************************************************

Since working on this post, my own uncle passed away (this is why it's been so long since I posted last). Though I'm not religious, I did wear black for a week. This was not intended to be a signal to others (black garb is too commonplace to stand out anymore anyway) but as my own private gesture of deference and sorrow, using the language I express myself with: clothes. I dedicate this entry-- as a fully inadequate demonstration of my own love and loss -- to Uncle Dick. Further reading:

"Shoeless in the Sanctuary," Dr. Yoel Shiloh
"Mourning," with more specific Biblical references, from the Jewish Encyclopedia
JewishFunerals.org
"Victorian Mouring Garb," Morbid Outlook

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

mocker-utilikilt

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:13:22 +0000

utilikilt-tuxedo

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:22:03 +0000

Cross-Posting Partnership

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 04 May 2009 19:27:54 +0000

+

I have partnered with the lovely Monica Sklar and her team at Worn Through, so I will be cross-posting there every-other week. Monica has multiple co-editors for an intelligent, well-rounded take on fashion history, fashion teaching, fashion book reviews and listings of exhibitions and calls for papers. Check it out here.

german-hyghalmen-roll-w-coat-of-arms-c-1485

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 16:02:31 +0000

This is a German Hyghalmen Roll showing coats of arms, circa 1485. Note the simple shapes and limited palette.

jockey color square

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 16:12:10 +0000

jousting-knights-from-sir-thomas-holmes-book-15th-cent

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 16:26:36 +0000

mary-cassatt-in-the-loge-opera-1880

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 16:59:54 +0000

off-track-betting-2008

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:25:34 +0000

off-track-betting-20081

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:26:07 +0000

kids-dressed-as-coachman-concierge-jockey-maid-c-1876-90

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:29:53 +0000

the-favorite-jockey-by-fred-archer-1881-1

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:55:50 +0000

owner-mr-w-hall-walker-mp-by-leslie-ward-spy-1906

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:58:14 +0000

triplets-of-bellville-racer

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 18:03:51 +0000

2009-kentucky-derby-finish-line-with-jockey-calvin-borel

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 18:09:40 +0000

un-jockey-angleterre-1796

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 20:48:45 +0000

Jockey Silks and Spectators

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 05 May 2009 21:17:48 +0000

[caption id="attachment_449" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="2009 Kentucky Derby finish line with leading jockey Calvin Borel"][/caption] With all the excitement of the Kentucky Derby culminating last weekend, I thought I'd take the opportunity to learn about (and share) the roots of horse racing apparel. To begin with the basics, jockey “silks” are comprised of white breeches and a bib, stock or cravat, and receiving them is a rite of passage for jockeys entering their first race ride. Horsemen wearing "colors" (as they're also known) has a long, illustrious past that has developed with the various horse sports. In ancient Rome for example, chariot drivers wore unique, brightly colored capes and headbands to identify themselves in the arenas. Roots in heraldry and coats of arms can be seen, the decorated shields and armor of which identified members of families and soldiers on battlefields, as jockeys came to be identified by their silks: [caption id="attachment_436" align="aligncenter" width="200" caption="This is a German Hyghalmen Roll with coats of arms, circa 1485. Note the simple shapes and limited palette."][/caption] Horse racing meets are recorded as far back as 1114, and individual silk colors are first mentioned in 1515 when Henry VIII occupied the English throne. In those early days of horse racing, few horses would compete and close finishes were rare enough that identification was not terribly problematic, but in the 18^th century, racing gained popularity. As more horses competed in each race, riders wore simple colored silk jackets to combat increasingly confused judges and spectators. This was not an entirely new idea: in medieval times, jousting knights wore bright, distinct colors which facilitated the identification of the competitors for the audience members of large arenas: [caption id="attachment_438" align="aligncenter" width="210" caption="Jousting knights from Sir Thomas Holmes' book, circa 1445."][/caption] In 1762 the English Jockey Club formalized what had been a general practice and requested that owners submit specific colors for riders’ jackets and caps, which were to be used consistently. Later that year they made the Newmarket resolution that owners must submit the racing silks for their horses to compete. From the minutes: “For the greater convenience of distinguishing the horses in running, and also for the prevention of disputes arising from not knowing the colors of each rider, the under-mentioned gentleman have come to the resolution and agreement of having the colors annexed to their names, worn by their respective riders.” [caption id="attachment_466" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=""Un Jockey Angleterre" (1796)"][/caption] More rules have been implemented since then. The horse owner or trainer selects and registers their jockey's colors (which includes colors and patterns) in national horse races; typically all horses belonging to a particular owner will be raced in the same colors. The owner must check the appropriate database (Weatherbys for England, The Jockey Club for the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada, etc.) as each racing silk must be unique. Patterns are created with squares, lines, circles and stars of contrasting colors. Uniforms at national races are very bright but regulations dictate a maximum of 4 colors. Japanese rules mandate that the hat color must match the gate color, but in other countries it must match the uniform. [caption id="attachment_437" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="This looks similar to the racing cheat-sheet I was given at the Irish tracks, which listed the horse names, jockeys, and had a crude depiction of the colors. You can see that Don't Get Mad and Greeley's Galaxy are owned by the same person."][/caption] Jockey silks used to be made of actual silk, though it is unsurprising that synthetics like nylon are often used nowadays, as they are for other athletic ensembles. The cut of jockey silks is close fitting for minimal wind resistance -- important when tenths of seconds can make the difference between first and second places -- but not tight, as the rider must have freedom of movement. Thin, lightweight materials like silk are ideal for ease of movement, breathability, and not adding bulk to jockeys for whom low weight is a necessity. Long or short sleeves may be chosen but jockeys usually prefer long sleeves that minimize chafing. A 2005 lawsuit granted The Jockey Club the right to add small logos and advertisements to the jockey pants which had previously been pure white. It's interesting to me that this sport previously resisted the seductive pull of ostentatious corporate sponsor logos that have visually taken over another track sport: car racing. It behooves (ha!) jockeys to stand out from others not only to distinguish themselves from their competitors, but also as walking (or running) advertisements for the owners, the jockeys' employers (even without literal sartorial branding). In a time when casual attire is more and more the norm, on the horse tracks pride in performance is still displayed with bright, shiny, colorful and patterned silks, where historically the attendees have been the upper class bourgeois, dressed in their own finery to see and be seen. This leads me into the class struggle that I see on the horse tracks. I believe the jockey silks serve yet another purpose: to distinguish them -- the hired talent -- from the owners and spectators. The owner-dictated colors to be worn by jockeys are already a kind of stamp of claim, and professional jockeys -- unlike gentlemen who ride or hunt for leisure -- are typically culled from the working class who often got their starts as humble stable boys. In his fascinating book "City Games: The Evolution of Americann Urban Society and the Rise of Sports (Sport and Society)," Steven A. Riess notes that "thoroughbred racing and yachting, strongly identified in the public mind as elite sports because of the exorbitant cost of participation and the restricted memberships of jockey and yacht clubs, served as status-defining communities." After being banned during the American Revolutionary era because of its associations both with the unpopular elite and immoral gambling, Jockey clubs were eventually created and justified "as the only means of developing superior horses for such uses as national defense (the cavalry) and transportation." [caption id="attachment_444" align="aligncenter" width="207" caption="Here is a card (c. 1876-90) depicting children dressed up as various professionals. Note that the jockey is included in an all-working-class / subservant lineup with coachman, concierge, and maid."][/caption] The horse track is one of the few daytime, outdoor activities where formal attire is expected; it's the plein air version of a night at the opera where the rich and famous (who may or may not actually care about the race outcome) can "see and be seen" while peering through their binoculars as opera-goers peered through their opera glasses. Mint juleps are served to daintily sipping guests while mud and dust spattered horses and jockeys are running for their lives -- and sometimes to their deaths. These jockeys, though respected after wins, have been depicted in rather startling ways. Jockeys are often portrayed as either boyish and/or with hunched posture: [caption id="attachment_445" align="aligncenter" width="161" caption=""The Favorite Jockey" by Fred Archer, 1881"][/caption] This begs physical comparison with jockeys' equine partners, as The Triplets of Bellville (2003) portrayed their cyclist athlete as a kind of horse-slave: [caption id="attachment_447" align="aligncenter" width="200" caption="Triplets of Bellville's hunched cyclist"][/caption] Compare to a horse owner. Note the erect posture, with top hat to emphasize his stature physically and socially (men of lower classes wore different hat styles): [caption id="attachment_446" align="aligncenter" width="163" caption="Owner Mr. W. Hall Walker MP by Leslie Ward ("Spy"), 1906"][/caption] The wonderful scene in My Fair Lady (filmed in 1964 but taking place circa 1916) illustrates the class prerequisite of the races. Lower-class Eliza Doolittle has never attended the races before, and her behavior in the exclusively upper crust setting is the final test of Henry Higgins' skill, who has forced himself upon her as her aristocratic mentor. It also displays Cecil Beaton's interpretation of the conspicuous fashion that lives on even today, with great humor and only slight exaggeration: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYMSvyqHHwA&fmt=18] A marvelous irony is that horse racing was one of the first venues for legal gambling (it has been argued that its popularity continued because of this), so for every preening attendee there is a gambler who probably cares less what he looks like or where he sees or hears about the race and more who actually wins, (wearing whatever he damn well feels like). [caption id="attachment_443" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Off Track Betting, 2008. The casual attire really stands out, non?"][/caption] Though I am undeniably attracted to race horsing as a genteel, civilized activity (I could never say I don't love excuses to wear big hats, for example), my pragmatic, socially progressive side abhors the class distinctions that the races perpetuate, exemplified still in the attire of athletes, attendees, and remote observers.

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Contact

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 06 May 2009 19:02:50 +0000

I love to hear from you! To send me questions, broken link notifications, or anything else, email me:

ThreadForThought@gmail.com

worn-through

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 06 May 2009 19:36:22 +0000

thread-for-thought1

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 06 May 2009 19:43:14 +0000

phrenology-and-thread-w-strand-vert-cropped

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 06 May 2009 19:47:02 +0000

Anna Wintour in Chanel at Met Costume Institute Gala 2008

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 26 May 2009 21:55:46 +0000

Metropolitan Museum facade

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 26 May 2009 21:56:19 +0000

Merode Altarpice by Robert Campin c1425 – 1428

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 26 May 2009 21:57:19 +0000

The swing by fragonard 1766

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 26 May 2009 21:58:14 +0000

Corporate Collaborations with the Arts

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 26 May 2009 22:03:52 +0000

Anna Wintour's involvement with the Metropolitan Museum is reestablished at this time every year with the Met's renowned Costume Institute gala, and we are again bombarded with pictures of A-list celebrities, socialites and models attending the lush affair. Whether attendees are portrayed in adoring light or to ridicule their outrageous outfits, the glut of coverage across paper publications and the internet succeeds in generating widespread coverage and awareness of the event, invaluable marketing for both the Met and the gala's loud sponsor, Vogue. These sorts of relationships are so ingrained in our capitalist system that many don’t give Anna Wintour's involvement in this museum fundraiser a second thought but, for me, it highlights the uneasy balance between cultural institutions and their sponsors. Especially in times of economic hardship, relationships between art centers and their patrons are ever more precarious and therefore precious. Among museums the Met retains one of the most prestigious reputations in the world. But the news that is perhaps the most widely disseminated about the Met every year is not about its new acquisitions, nor its beautiful newly renovated American wing, but the Costume Institute gala, arguably the most hotly anticipated social event -- to say nothing of fundraising events -- of the year. The 700 invitations are coveted by high society and pop culture icons alike, and the photos are disseminated equally by pop culture websites, blogs, and newspapers. I freely admit that I comb the internet for photos of the chic attendees -- more than other galas or award ceremonies even -- as there is always a fashion theme relating to the spring costume exhibit that is supposedly being promoted by the event, which I think prompts people to be even more outlandish in their sartorial selections than they might otherwise be, glamorous lives notwithstanding. This year's “Models as Muse” was a bit weak in terms of gala inspiration (it resulted in many haute micro-mini skirt ensembles), but it did succeed in attracting celebrities who may or may not actually be personally invested in the museum's mission (specifically the “advance knowledge of works” “in accordance with the highest professional standards”), but whose presence attracts the photographers nonetheless. [caption id="attachment_532" align="aligncenter" width="137" caption="Helena Christensen at Met Costume gala, 2009, doing her own shilling for Vogue in Zac Posen dress"][/caption] Michael Gross concentrates on the questionable relationship between the Met and Vogue in his newly released book "Rogue's Gallery: The Secret History of the Moguls and the Money that Made the Metropolitan Museum." In it, he blames the Met's collaboration first with Diana Vreeland and then with Anna Wintour to co-host the Costume Institute fundraiser which, he claims, has been twisted into a publicity platform for Vogue and Wintour's personal vendettas, displacing the Met’s own mission. "The most highly publicized event at the museum has been turned into a magazine and movie-promotion party, where Anna sells herself and movie stars sell their latest projects," said Gross. "What gets lost in the process is the museum." Suspicious as I am of Vogue’s motives (it is clearly in their best interest to invite the beautiful people they’d like to court to be in Vogue’s own pages), I whole heartedly support utilizing an institution's fashion collection as a revenue generator -- which the Costume Institute absolutely is for the Met, raising a significant portion of the museum’s income (the 2008 total of which was $297,790,000). First, as demonstrated by my drive to work on this very blog, I believe there is a wealth of knowledge -- social, financial, and political history for starters -- to be gleaned from the study of clothes, just waiting to be disseminated in an engaging and articulate manner. I crave museums tackling projects involving costume. Tragically, many institutions small and large (i.e. Merchant House, Brooklyn Museum) have fabulous costume collections that are rarely displayed and even more rarely exhibited in-house due to budget, space, staff, and/or costume history expertise shortages. Second, costume exhibits have been proven to be excellent revenue generators precisely because anything fashion related draws in younger, pop-culture obsessed people who may not otherwise attend museums that have the unfortunate reputation for housing stuffy, inaccessible “high art.” I have no problem whatsoever utilizing fashion exhibitions to tap into this market. Isn't the goal of museums to market their exhibitions to attract in people, and then actually teach them to look more deeply into a subject they may only have had a superficial understanding of? The trick is for museums to capitalize on this obsession with glamorous fashion. Obviously, money can and should be raised for the institutions. Museums increasingly struggle for attendees, and in this free market democracy, private investors are relied upon to fund so-called worthy projects more than the government is. With the latest financial crisis, corporate sponsors have become ever more sparse (working for the Development department of a New York museum, I have witnessed this scramble first-hand). In some cases, this has forced museums to hike their admissions (in New York it's not uncommon for tickets to be $20), which has the unfortunate cyclical consequence of making these exhibitions even less accessible to the general public. Do these galas confirm the perception, accurate or not, that fashion is inaccessible to the mainstream public? Or worse yet, that the study and presentation of fashion in an historical context is unimportant, has no bearing on "serious" studies, offers no insight into history, and has no greater implication on or by current events? My fear with the Met Costume Institute gala is that Vogue’s self-promotion cannibalizes what could and should be an opportunity to present fashion as an incredible marker of human civilization that varies according to technological breakthroughs in materials, social morays, etc. I'm doubtful these parties accomplish this. And this is due, in part, to the accompanying spring Costume Institute exhibitions that are usually of the blockbuster variety with a lot of flash and glitz, but weak-themed and presented with little-to-no background information drawing from a larger historical context, which in my mind must be the crux of any exhibition, costume or otherwise (I am specifically thinking of the popular but superficial “Chanel” and “Superheroes” exhibitions). As friends know, there are few things that exasperate me more than a flubbed costume exhibit. The wasted opportunity hits me like a brick in the face: that money could be collected, venue provided, fashion displayed, and the opportunity to use costume as a teaching tool not utilized kills me. Partly because I'll walk away disappointed for the lack of new information I personally collect, but mostly because I'm all too aware of how superfluous and flighty the majority of the population views fashion, and exhibits that don't treat the subject academically confirm people's belief that there is nothing but pretty, outrageous, or at best creative works at play and nothing deeper. This is perhaps a I see the Met's Costume Institute gala as just such a wasted opportunity to broaden the public's opinion and understanding of fashion's relevance and importance. Museums must weigh the pros and cons of the opportunities corporate money affords them -- not just more elaborate exhibits but more advertising to reach wider audiences -- versus the control corporate sponsors believe they become entitled to exert (i.e. Rudy Giuliani's attempt to cut the Brooklyn Museum's public funding when it exhibited controversial material in the "Sensation" exhibit of 1999). The American Museum of Natural History in New York actually had trouble securing sponsorship for their 2005 Darwin exhibition because (exasperating as it is to me), creationism and the so-called "theory" of evolution continues to be incendiary and corporations were afraid of alienating their own potential supporters, political and financial. (Ironically -- or not so? -- once funding was secured, the Darwin exhibition was extremely popular.) The Museum made up for this difficulty with its latest corporate partnership. The movie series Night at the Museum prominently incorporated two Smithsonian museums: the first film (2006) took place in the Museum of Natural History, the second (2009) in the Smithsonian Institute, and it actually contains “Smithsonian” in the title: marketing jackpot! This arrangement gave writers license to incorporate actual Smithsonian-owned ephemera (like Amelia Earhart’s plane, Dorothy’s ruby slippers, etc., used to great comic effect) into the plots, and both museums have enjoyed the reciprocal reaction of an immediate and impressive surge in attendance. I see this as a fair exchange. Like the Museum of Natural History, the Met needs to reassert its power and purpose with Vogue (or another sponsor), because the Costume Institute is more than an exclusive venue, and should be leveraged as such. Much as I’ve concentrated on current corporate collaborations, the alliance of patron and artist (or art institution) is not a new subject, though it’s taken new forms. The Mérode Altarpice is a triptych by the early Netherlandish painter Robert Campin, c. 1425 – 1430. Though ostensibly a religious painting depicting the popular Annunciation, the commissioning family was painted directly into the religious scene (left panel). They also guaranteed their identities by their coat of arms seal in the window, and by the presence of a costume (yay costume historians!) typical of a town messenger from Mechelen, where the family was from. [caption id="attachment_524" align="aligncenter" width="497" caption="The Merode Altarpice by Robert Campin c.1425 – 1428"][/caption] As religious paintings waned in popularity, patrons continued to be inserted into works. Fragonard’s “The Swing” (1766) is a delightfully naughty painting portraying a pink-clad woman (I will refrain from dissecting her ensemble in greater juicy detail, though I’m tempted!) being pushed on a swing by a bishop in the background, while her "hidden” lover in the foreground gazes admiringly up her yawning skirt. John Fleming writes “The identity of the patron is unknown, though he was at one time thought to have been the Baron de Saint-Julien, the Receiver General of the French Clergy, which would have explained the request to include a bishop pushing the swing. This idea as well as that of having himself and his mistress portrayed was evidently dropped by the patron, whoever he may have been.” Fleming points out “the picture was depersonalized and, due to Fragonard's extremely sensuous imagination, became a universal image of joyous, carefree sexuality,” (my italics) as opposed to a straightforward vanity portrait. Since then, corporate sponsorship has replaced less conspicuous donations as a major funding vehicle for many arts organizations.

[caption id="attachment_525" align="aligncenter" width="244" caption=""The Swing" by Fragonard, 1766"][/caption] So collaborations between moneyed patrons and starving artists has not been uncommon historically, but patrons were not advertising themselves -- no revenue was expected from the inclusion of their images in commissioned paintings, unlike corporate sponsors today who slap their logos on every visible posterboard. There can be mutually beneficial relationships -- partnerships -- established between non-profits and corporations (as with Fragonard and his patron), but it's vital that those non-profits remember that they need not be beggars bending to the whim of their sponsors. Corporations can offer money, but museums offer credibility in public relations and marketing return. Children today may very well associate Exxon Mobile with the funding of public television instead of my own foremost memory, the infamous Exxon oil spill of 1989, and the Altria Group, owner of cigarette giant Philip Morris, is not coincidentally one of the most significant donor to the arts in a transparent but successful attempt to gain positive PR-by-association. Perceived cultural good will is important in any era, but essential in times like these when the financial sector and big business are regarded as especially villainous. I don’t condemn corporate backing; I just want curatorial integrity to remain in tact. Further Reading:

"Corporate Sponsorship A Growing Area of Arts Concern" AllBusiness.com, October 2000
"Fashion Victim," NYTimes.com, May 6, 2005
"Ethics and the Visual Arts" edited by Elaine A. King, Gail Levin, Allworth Communications, Inc., 2006
“Establishing Dress History,” Lou Taylor, Manchester University Press, 2004
“Patronizing the Arts,” Marjorie Garber, Princeton University Press, 2008
“Night at the Museum Smithsonian's PR bonanza” NPR.org, May 21, 2009
“Smithsonian Hopes to Cash in On Stiller Movie” NPR.org, May 21, 2009

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Anna Wintour in Chanel at Met Costume Institute Gala 2008

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 26 May 2009 22:08:01 +0000

Met Costume Gala 2009 - Helena Christensen Vogue dress

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 26 May 2009 22:11:00 +0000

Anna Wintour in Chanel at Met Costume Institute Gala 2008 w strings

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 26 May 2009 22:17:35 +0000

Employment for a Fashion History Writer

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:29:38 +0000

I was laid off from the Whitney Museum last week due to budget cuts (not unexpected exactly, but still inconvenient) and so I begin the arduous task of finding a new job. My professional experience has been in administration, marketing, database management, and other non-fashiony things, but for obvious reasons I'd like to use this as an opportunity to merge my personal passion with my profession. If you are aware of any job opportunities that involve fashion history, and which utilize writing / researching / computer / database skills, don't keep them to yourself! I'd appreciate any and all leads; even if you don't have a personal connection yourself but know of an institution or publication or website where work like mine might make sense, suggest it! My email can be found on the Contact page via the button on the right. Wish me luck (I'll need it)!

John Singer Sargent - Madame Edouard Pailleron 1879

Tove Hermanson — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:17:36 +0000

Mary Cassatt - The Cup of Tea 1879

Tove Hermanson — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:22:17 +0000

job search newspaper

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:42:45 +0000

Bicycle Chic & Athletic Aesthetics

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:15:40 +0000

You might have noticed, as I have, a proliferation of articles about “bicycle style” in recent months. Mayor Bloomberg has invested money in designating bike paths and adding bike racks to make New York friendlier to the traffic easing, eco-friendly transportation. Fashion has responded and, being the fashion culturalist I am, I’ve been slowly making links and connections to the history of bike fashions -- and sportswear fashion in general -- in an attempt to gain greater insight into this resurgence in popularity. Let’s start with the advent of bicycle culture and dress, shall we? The first bicycles were manufactured in America in 1878. Strolling down boulevards was already a favorite pastime of the leisure class, but this wheeled invention fast became a popular sport. Men had little difficulty straddling these “velocipeds” in their trousers, but the heavy, voluminous, dragging skirts of the time -- not to mention the upper-body immobility imposed by structured corsets which inhibited both bending at the waist and breathing -- made it nearly impossible for women to participate in the exciting activity. Fashion aside, bicycling was initially deemed dangerous for women, who were not encouraged to exert themselves physically nor to assert their independence (i.e. stray too far from the domestic homefront literally or figuratively). [caption id="attachment_3567" align="aligncenter" width="241" caption="Bloomer costume, 1851. The bloomer costume consisted of lose harem-like pants that were collected at the ankles, worn under a skirt in the typical style of day, save its length which was roughly 6” shorter than the acceptable hemline."][/caption] Invented in the 1850s, the bloomer costume provided an obvious source of activewear for women by covering their legs while allowing them the freedom of a bifurcated garment. However it had only ever been adopted by fringe Victorian dress reformers who were ridiculed by the press as radical feminists with silly, indecent (still!) sartorial selections, and it never achieved widespread acceptance in this form. Somehow by the mid 1890s the social stigma of women on bicycles had all but vanished and as a result, “bicycle costumes” were actually lauded as preserving modesty while preserving health. These outfits bore suspicious (and unacknowledged) resemblance to the disparaged bloomer costume by alleviating some of the major fashion impediments with narrower skirts and fewer under-layers. Here is a description of an acceptable female riding outfit from 1895:

“A combination garment was worn next [to] the skin – all wool in cold weather and cotton in warm. Over this she wore no corset, but a patent waist without bones, to which were buttoned the circular bands of drawers and petticoats. It will be seen that the waist escaped much of the pressure and dragging incident to the old style of dressing, as the only bands were of the least trying shape. Her dress skirts and waists were hooked to each other all around, thus insuring their staying together, while they were loose enough for comfort.”

[caption id="attachment_3569" align="aligncenter" width="200" caption="Woman in cycling costume, buckled at ankles. 1895"][/caption] Above is a pattern for a bicycling costume, sold in that same 1894 magazine. This pattern is for an adaptable costume, allowing the wearer to buckle the skirt around her legs for complete coverage of those scandalous ankles. Then she could unbuckle the skirt for a more lady-like traditional look when not on the bicycle. [caption id="attachment_3570" align="aligncenter" width="200" caption="Woman in convertible cycling costume, loose. 1895"][/caption] I was interested to note that even in 1895, the perceived sexual transgressions of the bicycle ensemble remained an issue. One author pointedly, if humorously, wrote “The great ladies of the land will unblushingly don man’s dress, or something alarmingly like it, and jump astride their apparatus.” [caption id="attachment_3571" align="aligncenter" width="271" caption="Woman on bicycle, 1922. Original caption: "No more messenger boys for the National Woman's Party--from president to messenger all the members of the staff are feminine. This is in accordance with the stipulation of Mrs. Belmont when she donated the National Women's Party Headquarters.""] [/caption]As athletic activities increased in general popularity over the following decades, athletic, lean bodies became the new standard of ideal beauty. The greatest jump was in the early 20th century as the voluptuous feminine form of previous centuries (excepting only the Napoleonic era) went from curvy hourglass to flat and tubular (elastic undergarments often assisted with this allusion, as the corset had in the past). The hemlines also rose in the 1920s, when energetic dance crazes like the Charleston literally shook the Western world (fun fact: the highest hemlines crept was 1” below the knee -- never higher until the 1960s). Dresses were often beaded, dripping with fringe, sashes, or asymmetrical hemlines to create pleasing effects while in motion -- a far cry from the stiff, heavy, wide, deliberately debilitating female garments of earlier eras. Men’s fashion too, slimmed down to accommodate the encouraged active lifestyle. [caption id="attachment_3572" align="aligncenter" width="225" caption=""For the well dressed man : comfort is the keynote of the modern man's wardrobe." Note the boxy but narrow silhouette with creeping hemlines. Note the boxy but narrow silhouette with creeping hemlines. 1922"][/caption] Wars always impact fashion and WWII certainly had a tremendous impact on the styles of the 1940s. Material and dye shortages in America necessitated civilian fabric rationing and even a limited palette of allowed colors. Elegant 1930s hemlines rose to mid-calf, the bias-cut draping (a favorite 1930s innovative method of using material cut at a 45 degree angle) was too wasteful to be employed anymore, and puffy sleeves and ruffles popular in the preceding decade were all but eliminated from popular fashion out of patriotic necessity. The silhouette contracted and became boxier, more militaristic and uniform-like. For the first time, women were encouraged to join the work force to replace their boys overseas, and their work in factories further necessitated clothes cut close to the body to avoid being caught in plant machinery. (This style was gleefully abandoned with Dior’s “New Look” of 1947, which had yards of non-utilitarian skirt fabric and which embraced a curvier, feminine form once again.) Jump ahead another few decades: though not what the era is most remembered for, track suits were introduced in the 1960s. At this time it was worn for specific physical activities like jogging and not as daily dress, but Americans worked physical fitness into their routines more and more. The 1980s saw a resurgence in obsession with athleticism, as Olivia Newton-John’s humorously dated song "Physical" (1981) attests: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQXECBdPgEA] Though the video is undeniably silly, the song "Physical" brought the sexual connotations of physical activity to the foreground. With exaggerated flushed and dewy makeup complimenting her workout leotard, Newton-John's double entendre embodied the wanton women 19th century men feared would come of skimpy (i.e. shorter) clothes. Preoccupation with the latest workout fads manifested itself in fashion quickly. Ensembles resembling aerobic workout outfits -- complete with sweat bands, legwarmers, and torn oversized sweatshirts -- surfaced in popular fashion and were eagerly perpetuated by pop icons like Pat Benetar and Loverboy’s Mike Reno, and seen in movies like Flashdance (1983). [caption id="attachment_3577" align="aligncenter" width="235" caption="Loverboy's lead singer Mike Reno in the 80s."][/caption] This was due -- at least in part -- to advancement in textile technology: the invention of new thin, lightweight, stretchy materials was well suited to sportswear. As in the 1850s when synthetic dye was invented (leading to “mauve madness”!), synthetic material had the property of taking especially vivid dyes extremely well, and is evidenced by all the neon colors now associated with the ‘80s. Likewise, the tracksuit and sneakers were adopted by some early hip hop musicians (all kept in ironic pristine condition). In this raging capitalist, brand-obsessed time of Regan and Thatcher, I suspect wearing clothes previously relegated to leisure activities was a subtle statement that people who could wear athletic gear had enough off-time (and therefore money) to devote to recreational sport, and an amusing side effect was that those very clothes eventually lost their cache due to widespread adoption by the public. Though not all specifically bicycle related, all the fashion changes I outlined speak to the larger issue of popular fashion responding to the specific physical needs (or fads) of the time: like the current explosion of people using bikes as an alternative mode of transportation and the resulting cycling projects and availability of bike lanes in urban settings. Throughout the history of the bicycle, the challenge seems to have been -- and to be -- assembling an outfit that accommodates the peculiarities of movement on bicycles in a practical manner, while integrating into mainstream fashion in an inconspicuous way so a cyclist may ride to a destination and enter a social or professional environment without needing to change. For this, America is looking to other countries that have been using bicycles as daily (as opposed to purely recreational) transportation for much longer, like Amsterdam, Copenhagen, and London. The New York Times reported that “Before [the London-based company] Rapha, there were two ways to be fashionable in cycling,” said Bill Strickland, the editor at large of Bicycling magazine and until recently the author of its Style Man column. “The first was to be supertechnical, and look like a pro. The other way was to be pure vintage. Rapha created a third way, starting with a premise of ‘How would I like to look in town?’ ” Though there are infinite paths to this end, I would imagine the one unavoidable restriction must be the amount of bulk at the crotch and ankles. They must all have relatively close-cut silhouettes with as little loose material as possible around the gears, while being flexible at the waist -- exactly where the dress reformers focused in the 19th century. Adding an additional layer of influence, this description happens to coincide with the male suit of the 1960s, which is also currently experiencing a surge of popularity. [caption id="attachment_3578" align="aligncenter" width="266" caption="bicycle chic 2009"][/caption] Aesthetic cultural influences are at work here, including but not limited to the popular Mad Men TV series. Set in the 1960s, this show has coincided with the resurgence of skinny jeans and slimmer, shorter trousers. This is evident even in formal wear; I spotted many a slim-fit tux at this year’s Academy Awards. Which came first: the retro look or the latest bicycle movement? Like most other fashion developments, many influences across cultural, ecological, and political spectrums have impacted the collective unconscious and manifested itself in everyday dress. Isn’t it fun to try to figure them all out? Further reading:

"The Bicycle and Health" The Ladies' Standard Magazine, April 1894
“The Wheelasa Reformer; What One Woman's Bicycle Has Taught Her About Clothes.” NYTimes, 1895
“Cyclistas spin into style” The Gazette, May 26, 2009
Fitness Fashion After 1960
Copenhagen Cycle Chic blog

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Fabric Vocabulary You Never Knew

USAGE:

"The warm, dark glow and plushy tone so typical of Central European orchestras from the late 19th century on seems steeped in the Staatskapelle's bones." Wynne Delacoma; Staatskapelle Berlin at Symphony Center; Chicago Sun-Times; Dec 12, 2000. "But since Hugo left university in June, he has not strolled into the sort of plushy job that supposedly awaits our hordes of upper-second graduates when they roar onto the job market." Rachel Johnson; Graduates Get Jobs -- But No Pay; The Daily Telegraph (London, UK); Dec 5, 2003.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's a wonderful thing that familiar items permeate our language in such creative ways. And it makes perfect sense that clothes and fabrics and materials, which have developed in tandem with the human race and which conjure up such specific, tangible references for us all, integrate themselves into dialect unrelated to technical apparel conversations. I listed some slightly obscure words, but terms like "silky" and expressions like "pulling the wool over your eyes" act as more common reminders of the power of fabric.

Lambdoidal Tweed Wool swatch

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:42:56 +0000

cotton flannel swatch

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:50:57 +0000

white churro wool blended with black llama fiber

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:55:23 +0000

cotton bush

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:00:16 +0000

polyester plush swatch

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:07:30 +0000

Ann Kagawa Lee toilet paper wedding dress winner 2009 - front

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:23:14 +0000

Ann Kagawa Lee toilet paper wedding dress winner 2009 - back

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:25:22 +0000

Ann Kagawa Lee toilet paper wedding dress winner 2009 - hat

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:26:37 +0000

Terri Glover toilet paper wedding dress 2nd place 2009 - front

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:28:29 +0000

Terri Glover toilet paper wedding dress 2nd place 2009 - back

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:29:30 +0000

Guadalupe Andrade toilet paper wedding dress 3rd place 2009 - front

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:31:05 +0000

Guadalupe Andrade toilet paper wedding dress 3rd place 2009 - back

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:32:06 +0000

Guadalupe Andrade toilet paper wedding dress 3rd place 2009 - back

Tove Hermanson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:32:21 +0000

Who Inspired Michael Jackson's Fashion?

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:07:06 +0000

In the wake of Michael Jackson's recent sudden death, there has been a predictable spike in pictures, radio and videos runs, articles and blog posts about the star. We often have the tendency to think of style icons as Athena: “born,” emerging from Zeus's head swathed in what was to be her trademark ensemble of full armor. This theory has been confirmed by the fact that most fashion discussion I've found has focused on Jackson's “iconic style” with parades of comparative photos of current celebrities wearing military-style coats, red leather jackets, mono-gloves, aviator shades, etc. -- all of which is appropriate testament to his talent and breadth of influence -- and yet there has been very little discussion on what influenced the man himself. At the risk of stating the obvious, none of us live in vacuums -- not even the rich and famous -- and as is my wont, I'm far more interested in the idol's own historical sartorial references, which he so successfully appropriated and interpreted that most people see him as a completely original trend setter. CLASSIC MOVIES & MUSICALS Though I favor his work in the Jackson 5 (I know there are many dissenters, but I do so love Motown!), considering his youth and the parental/managerial influence present during those early years, I will concentrate mainly on his mid-to-late career, after he had emerged as a solo artist. I'll start then with his movie debut at age 20 as the Scarecrow alongside Diana Ross's Dorothy in The Wiz (1978), remake of the classic The Wizard of Oz (1939), which introduced him to the wonderful world of classic movies. I'm not the first to see how those suave, glittery MGM musicals manifested themselves both in Jackson's dancing and wardrobe. Jackson regularly sported white suits (see Thriller album cover for a casual, pared down version) with matching fedoras bearing uncanny resemblance to the ensemble Fred Astaire wears with Cyd Charisse in The Band Wagon (1953). For those unfamiliar with that mediocre musical (for which I have an inexplicable tenderness), “The Girl Hunt Ballet” dance number is a musical-within-a-musical where Astaire and Charisse enact a '40s film noir-style murder mystery: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDGGw3RH5ug] Here's Michael's version from the "Smooth Criminal" video: [caption id="attachment_620" align="aligncenter" width="259" caption="Michael Jackson in Smooth Criminal, wearing white suit with spats and fedora. And isn't the 45 degree lean dance move a more graceful version of the Tin Man's move from the original Wizard of Oz?"][/caption]

Even the alternate, more informal versions of Jackson's look consisting of black slacks, white tank top, unbuttoned white undershirt and fedora may very well have been a deconstructed vestmental homage to Astaire, one of the most formal of the musical men in film. (I admit I may be reading just a wee bit too much into this one, but isn't the game fun?) [caption id="attachment_621" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Michael Jackson in white undershirt and fedora"][/caption] Michael in HIStory tour (1997) white suit: [caption id="attachment_622" align="aligncenter" width="206" caption=" "][/caption]

And West Side Story (1961) undoubtedly influenced both the “Beat It” (1983) and “Bad” (1987) videos, down to the line dance choreography style. Jackson's videos have only slightly less dubiously threatening song-and-dance gang confrontations. “Bad” even mimics the set of West Side Story's “Cool” number, which also occurs in a garage, moments after the Jets' gang leader (Riff) is killed by the rival gang in a scuffle: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqg0gqj_UuU] “Bad” video (click twice on the screen below): [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uG5NhkxQJQc] “Beat It” video (again, click twice to view): [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uqxo1SKB0z8] Michael's signature ankle-bearing pants paired with penny loafers and white socks highlighted his dance moves, it's true. But they also bear telling resemblance to another famous song-and-dance movie star, Gene Kelly: [caption id="attachment_623" align="aligncenter" width="297" caption="Gene Kelly in loafers and rolled pants"][/caption] Jackson's take: [caption id="attachment_624" align="aligncenter" width="218" caption=" "][/caption]

Though not a movie star, the undeniable live concert showman James Brown was explicitly credited by Michael as being hugely influential. They share a talent for energetic performances, impressive tonal ranges (not many can hit those upper registers like these two!), and love of shiny jackets and straightened hairstyles. Jackson and Brown performing at the 2003 BET Awards in Los Angeles: [caption id="attachment_625" align="aligncenter" width="209" caption=" "][/caption]

There was also a healthy dose of Elvis inspiration evident in Jackson, what with his penchant for gold lame and gyrating crotch moves. In an interesting (some might say disturbing) twist, Jackson actually married Presley's daughter Lisa Marie, thus tapping into his idol's bloodline while possibly attempting to silence gay / sexual deviant rumors (the molestation trial was a mere year before the short-lived marriage). THE DARK MISFIT Thus far I've concentrated on Michael's fondness for classic cinema and musicals, but there were most definitely darker influences as well. His leather-and-buckle style emerged perhaps as Michael struggled with his life of imposed near-solitude and the battle for privacy he fought from the media and crazed fans. He seemed to identify with, and then project, a kind of misunderstood misfit persona, even while continuing grueling tours and recording sessions. April's auction of Jackson's ephemera included many of his home furnishings, sculptures, children's race cars, and many many spangly clothes, but what caught my special notice were the Edward Scissorhands (1990) prop hands. [caption id="attachment_626" align="aligncenter" width="241" caption="Johnny Depp as Edward Scissorhands (1990)"][/caption] It turns out that Jackson had aggressively lobbied for title part in Tim Burton's movie, and I've since realized this interest makes perfect sense. He was dressing like Edward Scissorhands before the movie was even made, with his wan skin tone, limp black hair, and ladders of leather straps and buckles. His penchant for these leather buckles was perhaps indicative of deeper, darker insecurities; desire for restraint in others and to be restrained oneself. They call to mind mental patients' restraints and also S&M gear, as was fitting for a man whose mental stability and sexuality were examined and questioned throughout his career. Jackson's interpretations: In gold lame with leather buckles catcher kneepads in HIStory tour (1992) in Prague: [caption id="attachment_627" align="aligncenter" width="259" caption=" "][/caption]

Michael Jackson touring Bad in Maryland 1988 (before E.S., the year he moves into Neverland Ranch): [caption id="attachment_628" align="aligncenter" width="200" caption=" "][/caption]

MILITARY / ROYALTY The other side of the shy, misunderstood outsider was Jackson's royal persona. His astounding collection of military jackets are protective in their stiffness, and project masculine virility and power with their broad shoulders (which temporarily mask Jackson's narrow frame), and suggestion of violent battle. They are also commonly worn by male monarchs (who typically rely on medals rather than Jackson's rhinestones for bling). Jackson was dubbed the “King of Pop” because of his extraordinary talent, but he shared other, less desirable similarities with kings. Like any monarch, his movement was confined to his personal properties and heavily guarded mobbed public appearances, which was undoubtedly trying. And since he achieved such fame at such a young age, like any prince or king, he had virtually no opportunity for normal, unfettered geographic exploration, and he alternately embraced this gift/curse -- as in his royal military ensembles -- and fought against it -- as in his more threatening, soldier-based military ensembles. Prince Charles: [caption id="attachment_629" align="aligncenter" width="266" caption=" "][/caption]

[caption id="attachment_630" align="aligncenter" width="217" caption="Michael Jackson in military shirt with child in 1993"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_631" align="aligncenter" width="275" caption="Jackson in more aggressive ammo military gear in 1993"][/caption] [caption id="attachment_632" align="aligncenter" width="268" caption="In royal military jacket at Elizabeth Taylor's birthday celebration in 1997"][/caption] Some of Jackson's military jackets were rather conservative, approximating their official prototypes, but many more were colorful, glitzy, and laden with sparkles. It's no coincidence that Jackson was a huge admirer of earlier pop royalty the Beatles (he procured the publishing rights to that influential band's songbook) whose influential album Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967) portrayed the Beatles in silly psychedelic '60s military gear: [caption id="attachment_635" align="aligncenter" width="209" caption=" "][/caption]

And Michael's interpretations: [caption id="attachment_615" align="aligncenter" width="222" caption="Michael Jackson and Brooke Shields at American Music Awards 1984"][/caption] The flamboyant "King of Pop" in his royal jacket, complete with golden sash and epaulets, with presidential royalty the Reagans in conservative suits: [caption id="attachment_636" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="President Ronald Reagan praises Jackson's contribution to the drunk-driving awareness, 1984"][/caption] SEXUALITY / GENDER As many rock stars do, Jackson walked a tightrope between hyper-masculinity and femininity. Even glossing over the gory details of the Neverland Ranch kiddie porn/molestation fiasco (starting in 1993), I would be remiss to ignore Michael Jackson's gender and sexuality issues. He never shied from gender ambiguity: on the contrary, he seemed to revel in them. His willowy body, straightened, flowing locks, lack of visible body or facial hair, permanent eyeliner and lipstick, and surgically slenderized jawline all contradicted his signature performative crotch grabs and pelvic thrusts. “In the Closet” (1991) is delightfully questionable in meaning, possibly referring to the unwanted media attention or to his ambiguous sexuality. Jackson's peek-a-boo curls emulate classic stars Rita Hayworth, Veronica Lake... [caption id="attachment_633" align="aligncenter" width="244" caption=" "][/caption]

and bear eerie resemblance to his close personal friend who happens to be a classic movie star herself, Elizabeth Taylor: [caption id="attachment_634" align="aligncenter" width="241" caption="Elizabeth Taylor, circa 1950s"][/caption] In the “Scream” (1995) video, Michael and sister Janet are dressed in identical outfits that are clearly designed to blur dissimilarities between the siblings, not least of which being their respective genders: [caption id="attachment_637" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "][/caption]

The umbrella Jackson started toting for portable shade blurred gender lines in a more subtle way, plucked from the long line of both Eastern and Western women protecting themselves from the sunlight's harsh rays by strolling with parasols. [caption id="attachment_638" align="aligncenter" width="299" caption="Michael Jackson with umbrella, circa 2009"][/caption] A geisha under a parasol (note the similar white skin and red mouth): [caption id="attachment_639" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "][/caption]

The body suits of the 1990s were generally worn by women, and then underneath pants. Jackson's body suits worn over his pants, served as inner-as-outwear, much as Madonna used Gautier's external corset/body suit in her Blond Ambition tour (1990). Though they were a female fashion, Jackson actually uses them to emphasize his crotch (Madonna did as well), both confusing gender lines and emphasizing male ones. Finally (but less interesting), the body suit has practical applications, staying put while the body underneath gyrates and writhes in dance, though I somehow doubt that's what attracted Michael to them. HIStory tour (1995): [caption id="attachment_640" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "][/caption]

Madonna in Jean-Paul Gautier's Blond Ambition bustier (1990). (She sometimes wore it over pants like Michael.) [caption id="attachment_641" align="aligncenter" width="225" caption=" "][/caption]

BURLESQUE Part of what feminized many of Jackson's ensembles were the sheer numbers of sparkles, lending a burlesque feeling to an otherwise masculine outfit. Much of his wardrobe was designed to remain visible to stadiums of thousands, but even in smaller gatherings and public appearances, the man indulged his penchant for rhinestones. Rhinestone studded and luminescent materials have a rich tradition in the (female dominated) burlesque world, highlighting every curve and suggestive movement for the audience. Again Michael taps into an overtly sexual genre, muddling his presentation of his sexuality. Dita Von Teese, covergirl of the neo-burlesque movement, as a sexy rhinestone cowboy: [caption id="attachment_642" align="aligncenter" width="225" caption=" "][/caption]

Selections from Michael's bedazzled wardrobe can be found in this slideshow. I mean, the man had bedazzled socks: [caption id="attachment_643" align="aligncenter" width="233" caption=" "][/caption]

Guy Trebay of the New York Times wrote, "More than almost any entertainer in memory, Michael Jackson was entirely of show business, and was seldom out of costume." His influences were culled from a wide variety of sources, but it's striking that even as he borrowed heavily from both genders' beauty standards, a wide timeline of popular fashion and pop culture references, etc., the celebrity influences were primarily caucasian / Eastern. His narrowing facial modifications, relaxed hair and mysterious extreme pallor externalize a complex struggle with race identity (in addition to the feminine associations and gender / sexuality questions they raise).

Many of Michael Jackson's fashions caught on (the red leather jacket, the single glove is making a comeback on the likes of Biance and Victoria Beckham, etc.), but many more were just so outrageous (silken face masks, male burkas) that they die with the man. One of the amazing aspects of Jackson's style (and I think this is a typical marker of a fashion icon) is that no matter how outrageous he looked throughout his life, he was consistent in the visual motifs with which he decorated himself, ultimately lending an agelessness to the man -- after shedding his afro, he pretty much looked like an indeterminate 20-or-30-something-year-old, did he not? May we all leave such a legacy, fashion, musical, or otherwise.

Further Reading / Viewing:

Deborah Nadoolman Landis, costume designer of several M.J. videos including Thriller, writes for FrockTalk "Michael Jackson fashion icon"
Video mashups:
West Side Story with “Bad” (1987) playing, sampling clips from WSS's knife fight scene and the “Cool” numbers. (There are many other similar mashups that actually splice Michael Jackson video clips with West Side Story ones.)
“Puttin' on the Ritz” with Michael Jackson actually ballroom and tap dancing in white tails and top hat circa 1977 when he was 19.
Fred Astaire set to Jackson's “Smooth Criminal”
New York Times slideshow

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

young Michael Jacson in sequins

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:00:52 +0000

Beatles - Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:16:17 +0000

Michael Jackson and Brooke Shields at American Music Awards 1984

Tove Hermanson — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:19:10 +0000

michale jackson smooth criminal lean in white suit with spats and fedora

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:50:03 +0000

michael jackson white undershirt and fedora

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:52:07 +0000

Michael Jackson white suit HIStory tour 1997

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:53:23 +0000

Gene Kelly in loafers and rolled pants

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:54:15 +0000

michael jackson cropped black pants and loafers

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:55:16 +0000

michael jackson and james brown at BET awards 2003

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:56:07 +0000

Johnny Depp as Edward Scissorhands 1990

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:57:27 +0000

Michael Jackson in gold lame with leather buckles catcher kneepads in HIStory tour 1992 Prague

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:58:30 +0000

Michael Jackson Maryland 1988

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:59:55 +0000

Prince Charles in military uniform

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:00:35 +0000

Michael Jackson fedora military shirt 1993

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:01:29 +0000

Michael Jackson ammo military leotard 1993

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:02:33 +0000

Michael Jackson royal military jacket at Elizabeth Taylors bday celebration 1997

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:03:49 +0000

michael jacksons flowing locks

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:06:38 +0000

Elizabeth Taylor 1950s

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:13:01 +0000

Beatles - Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:14:34 +0000

Michael Jackson in blue military jacket Ronald Regan 1984 drunk driving award

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:17:27 +0000

michael and janet jackson scream video still

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:21:22 +0000

michael jackson with umbrella

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:22:02 +0000

geisha under parasol

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:23:47 +0000

Michael Jackson gold lame bodysuite HIStory tour 1997

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:24:34 +0000

Madonna in Gautier bustier Blond Ambition tour 1992

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:25:29 +0000

Dita Von Teese as rhinestone coyboy

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:25:59 +0000

Michael Jackson sequined socks

Tove Hermanson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:26:37 +0000

Victorian tea cup

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:23:19 +0000

Day dress, 1883–85 by Charles Frederick Worth

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:18:06 +0000

From the Met's website: "Lavish textiles were not only used for evening wear in Worth's designs, as this day dress of cut and uncut voided velvet attests. The ensemble also provides an example of Worth's practice of incorporating elements of historic dress in his designs. The large scale of the pomegranate and floral motif follow the style of Louis XIV textile patterns. The bodice and overskirt, made in one piece and worn over a separate skirt, is known as a polonaise, a modified version of an eighteenth-century style popularized by Marie Antoinette. A day dress like this would have been appropriate for walking or making social calls. The back of the polonaise has been expertly draped to accommodate the bustle worn by fashionable women in the 1880s."

Whistler's Mother, 1871

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:50:15 +0000

”The Ermine Portrait” of Queen Elizabeth by Nicholas Hilliard, 1585

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:56:26 +0000

Fragonard's The Swing, 1766

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:59:46 +0000

The Tea Gown in Fashion and Art

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:05:26 +0000

Due to a coveted invitation to my friend's tea party this weekend, I have that genteel social event on my mind. And since I always have costume on my mind as well, it's only natural that I should want to dissect a portrait of a young woman enjoying the same activity that I shortly will. [caption id="attachment_547" align="aligncenter" width="348" caption=""The Cup of Tea" by Mary Cassatt, 1879"][/caption] Mary Cassatt's "The Cup of Tea" is a portrait of Cassatt's sister, Lydia Simpson, wearing a pink gown, circa 1879 (among other date indicators, Lydia's flat-lying skirt suggests horsehair crinolines underneath, which made a brief return to fashion between 1876 and 1882 before being replaced by the bulkier bustle). “Tea gowns,” essential garments of the late 19th and early 20th century wardrobes and invented by the tea obsessed English, are frilly, decorative, and also comfortable, often achieved by a looser fit uncommon in other dresses of the 19th century. Though Lydia's dress appears rather fitted -- you can clearly see the outline of her corset at her tiny waist and gently bulging belly -- it's possible that her arm is blocking our view of a looser fitting back, allowing her to recline more comfortably. The profile of a stiffer seated subject was famously used to portray an older, darker, more somber portrait: that of “Whistler's Mother,” officially entitled the more clinical “Arrangement in Grey and Black: The Artist's Mother” (1871), and I doubt it's a coincidence that Whistler's mum was painted just a few years earlier than Cassatt's sis. [caption id="attachment_649" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "][/caption]

A small enough amount of lace is present in the Lydia's cuffs so that it's conceivable that handmade lace -- a precious luxury item -- was used. However, the appearance of a Great Exhibition in Paris just a year before this portrait helped popularized machine-made lace, making it more accessible and far more affordable, so it is reasonable to think that Lydia wears some. The rich silk-satin fabric advertises Lydia's wealth, and though it is possible that Lydia's dress was sewn with the help of the sewing machine (a major asset to the fashion industry since the 1840s), the upper class still preferred the personally designed, tailored and unique looks generated by the haute couture industry. Charles Frederick Worth (1827-1893) was an Englishman who pioneered the haute couture experience with his House of Worth located in Paris. Founded 1858, his success corresponded with France's Second Empire which devoted considerable energy to rebuilding the luxury textile / fashion trades Paris had been known for before the French Revolution (1789 – 99), during which all things seen as bourgeois were attacked, very much including high fashion. Worth not only capitalized upon the climbing demand for sumptuous clothes, he absolutely revolutionized the dress purchasing experience, turning it into a social event for the privileged. Instead of being visited by a doting tailor, as in the past, a 19th century woman in need of a new dress would go to her fashion house (others opened after Worth's, though his remains the most acclaimed to this day). There she would be received in a decadent parlor filled with other wealthy society ladies, and a fashion show would parade before them, to select the styles they desired. Consultations on fabrics and trimmings would follow (these finishing touches would distinguish the same dress style purchased by different women), measurements taken, the final product being a unique work of wearable art. The elegant simplicity of Lydia's gown makes it a possible product of the House of Worth itself. Here is a gown from the House of Worth just a few years after Cassatt's painting:

[caption id="attachment_648" align="aligncenter" width="234" caption="Day dress, 1883–85 by Charles Frederick Worth. From the Met's caption: "Lavish textiles were not only used for evening wear in Worth's designs, as this day dress of cut and uncut voided velvet attests. The ensemble also provides an example of Worth's practice of incorporating elements of historic dress in his designs. The large scale of the pomegranate and floral motif follow the style of Louis XIV textile patterns.""][/caption] During the High Victorian Period (1850-1885), a strict regulation of clothes was maintained. According to these laws of dress, Lydia's high neckline, three-quarter length sleeves and sumptuous fabric show that the portrait captured a moment of the afternoon (as opposed to plunging décolleté with short sleeves which were for fancier evening activities, or if the same dress were made with less refined material like cotton, it would have indicated casual dress for mornings). As the title suggests, the primary purpose of this painting was not portraiture, but the depiction of a popular social ritual. And though Cassatt was American, she frequently depicted bourgeois Parisian society, which, "between 1870 and 1914 was thrown back on its own devices to satisfy its taste for elegance. The Ancien Regime and the Imperial aristocracy, the bourgeoisie enriched by the economic revival, and the spendthrifts, frivolous demi-monde that succeeded to the follies of the Second Empire, all provided an easy prey for the new lords of elegance, the masters of Couture and Fashion,” as Francois Boucher noted.

[caption id="attachment_545" align="aligncenter" width="244" caption=""Madame Edouard Pailleron" by John Singer Sargent, 1879"][/caption] In John Singer Sargent's “Madame Edouard Pailleron,” also painted in 1879, a similar look is achieved. A small departure is that Lydia wears a tea gown while Mme Pailleron wears a fashionable dress suitable for outdoor activity, and this is confirmed by her grassy surroundings. The same idealized long-waisted hourglass figure is achieved with the same long corset. She lifts her skirts enough to reveal the crinolines we assumed Lydia wore. Where Lydia's tea gown of soft silk satin was conducive for casual indoor comfort, Mme Pailleron's stiff dress is probably silk taffeta and more appropriate for formal public appearances. In contrast to Lydia's ultra-feminine and youthful pink, Mme Pailleron wears somber black, obviously a fashion choice and not imposed on her by rules of mourning (see my earlier post), as she also has a large white tulle bow around her neck and flamboyant red flowers on her shoulder -- unacceptable for mourning. In spite of its conservative color, Mme Pailleron's dress is highly decorated with short, layered ruffles along the hemline (it must've sounded divine, rustling with her movements!), a band of beadwork around the hips and neckline, lace sleeves and lace strips draped around the skirt (machine-made, judging from the length and quantity), and taffeta bows on the cuffs and skirt. Though both women have white tulle around their necks and cuffs, that tulle is Lydia's only dress ornamentation. As expected, the two women seem to be following the same fashion trends, the major differences only being those that can be attributed to different activities. Lydia's light but voluminous collar is similar to Mme Pailleron's of the same year, and Lydia has taken it to an extreme so that it becomes reminiscent of the standing ruffs of the 16th century, which was a major social status symbol, made of that precious lace, laboriously starched, and difficult to keep clean in its proximity to the face: [caption id="attachment_650" align="aligncenter" width="273" caption=""The Ermine Portrait” of Queen Elizabeth by Nicholas Hilliard, 1585"][/caption] Revival styles (or "flashback fashion" as I like to call them) was extremely popular in the 1870s, and Lydia seemed to embrace this fascination with the past. Her costume suggests an affinity for Neo-Rococo taste: the soft, curvy lines exaggerated by the hourglass corset, the fitted, three-quarter length sleeves ending in a flurry of bell-shaped white lace, not to mention the vaginal billowing pink silk, are all reminiscent of Fragonard's Rococo painting "The Swing" (1766). This painting, along with the original Rococo movement a century earlier, was obsessed with the idea of femininity and sexuality in the eyes of the voyeur: [caption id="attachment_651" align="aligncenter" width="234" caption="Fragonard's "The Swing," 1766"][/caption] Lydia's style would have been well noted, as she lived a life where to be a successful society woman, one had to keep up appearances. With the completion of Garnier's Parisian Opera in 1874, the opera became an important place to see and be seen. Opera glasses were just as often used to observe audience members as they were to watch performers on stage, and usually by the traditional voyeurs: men. Not limited to sexual voyeurism, a man would survey his business competitor's wife to see how well she was dressed, her appearance a direct reflection of how successful her husband was. Baudelaire wrote that woman was "the object of keenest admiration and curiosity that the picture of life can offer to its contemplator.” Mary Cassatt and the Impressionist art movement was fascinated with this phenomenon, often painting these privileged voyeurs at the Opera. Cassatt continues this theme in “The Cup of Tea,” eliminating her sister's companion from the composition and making the viewer of the painting Lydia's voyeur -- all the more titillating, perhaps, as tea time was a female ritual that men would not see at all -- except in paintings. The floral theme in “The Cup of Tea” warrants examination as well. Throughout art history, flowers have acted as a visual metaphor for a woman's sex, and the concept of the femme fleur was especially popular in Victorian times. The melding of the flower in Lydia's hat with the flowers in the flowerbox behind her is echoed by her bell-shaped cuffs and the rosettes making up her collar, which gives a floral illusion when viewed en masse. Furthermore, the blurred lines between hat flower and flowerbox flower create a physical unity with the house, thus suggesting a traditional psychological unity of woman with the home. Though feminist movements had manifested themselves in both fashion (with the invention of the Bloomer costume in 1849) and politics (with the women's suffrage movement), it is clear that neither Mary nor Lydia Cassatt subscribed to these radical ideas, instead perpetuating traditional stereotypes of feminine roles in painting and costume. But enough of Lydia, and on to more important, current issues: what will I wear to my own tea party?

Further Reading:

“The Cult of the Tea Gown”
"Tea Trot" photo montage, NY Times

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Tove on Blue

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:50:35 +0000

Coraline button icon

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:28:32 +0000

Coraline credit in thread

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:30:04 +0000

Coraline opening credits de-stuffing doll

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:31:45 +0000

Coraline opening credits choosing button

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:32:15 +0000

Coraline opening credits sewing button

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:32:39 +0000

Other Mother at sewing machine

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:37:22 +0000

Mother in front of gray uniforms

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:40:28 +0000

Coraline and pillow parents in bed

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:40:55 +0000

Louise Bourgeois, Cell VII, 1998

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:42:27 +0000

Coraline Other Mother as spider - front

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:47:48 +0000

Louis Henry Charles Moeller the Sewing Circle

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:54:26 +0000

Louise Bourseois Spider, 1997

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:22:50 +0000

Other Mother 's doll kit1

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:24:04 +0000

early 19th century sewing sampler by Elizabeth Lyle

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:32:05 +0000

Women sewing in Lower East Side den, by Jacob Riis c. 1889

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:24:01 +0000

Lower East Side NY garment factory

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:41:21 +0000

Jacob Riis, Necktie workshop in Division Street tenement, 1889

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:42:52 +0000

Coraline Scottie dogs on shelf

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:25:45 +0000

Coraline Bobinski's circus mice

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:28:57 +0000

knitting Coraline's miniature sweater

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:11:48 +0000

Craftiness in Coraline & Domestic Sewing Traditions

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:19:17 +0000

Last week I watched the movie Coraline (2009), directed by the stop-motion animator master Henry Selick who achieved recognition for his collaboration with Tim Burton in The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993). I was kind of blown away by his latest effort; it succeeded on many levels, but for the sake of this blog I'll limit my enthusiasm to the crafty parts. The loving attention to hand crafts -- and needlework in particular -- starts immediately with the opening credits which are done in a font that mimics embroidery, complete with visible stitches and deliberate loose threads dangling off the names:

The next 1 ½ minutes of credits include careful closeups of a doll being undone, unraveled, un-stuffed, taken apart stitch by stitch, and then reassembled (note the creator's hands are composed of needles themselves):

There's a lovely shot of a button drawer being pulled out and poured over,

a needle poking through rough cloth (you can see every fibre in 3-D!) and sewing the selected button on,

reusing the limp burlap chassis to meticulously create another doll with variations that make it resemble Coraline, down to her raincoat:

REPETITION. REPETITION. Just as puppet masters created Coraline puppets in multiples with slight clothing, expression, hair and rumpled variations to make the movie, duplication and cloning are visual motifs within the movie. Coraline’s mother picks out a mass-produced gray school uniform among a rack of identical uniforms,

all the neighbors have collections of identical animals: the burlesque sisters with their Scottie dogs (3 living, many more stuffed on shelves),

and the Amazing Bobinski with his circus mice:

And when Coraline’s parents go missing, she touchingly tucks herself into bed with crudely handmade dolls of them, formed out of pillows with dad’s glasses and mom’s neck brace (a doll making dolls of other dolls):

Looking at the plot, we see this theme of multiplicity is a satisfyingly consistent one: the neighbor kid Wybee’s grandma has a(n evil) twin sister; the entire concept of the Other Mother and Other World with nearly identical houses, and gardens and neighbors echo and compliment each other within the framework of the story. These devices create an eerie mirrored alternate world like those in a Borges story, but also relate to the duplicate film sets (which were actually constructed by set builders, not created digitally), dolls, clothes, etc., behind-the-scenes. The evil twin / menacing other world is not exactly original subject matter for suspense-horror films which often tap into fears of duplicitousness and two-facedness, but I particularly love how the duplication appears in front of the camera and behind it in Coraline. CRAFTINESS Crafty, homemade objects are featured prominently. Coraline’s Other Mother cooks homemade meals, creates hand-sewn outfits for her, etc. Coraline (and the viewer, by extension) recognizes these as signs of affection. Interpreted as labors of feminine love at first, they are revealed to be sinister, employed as a trap. When the Other Mother reveals her true physical form as a terrifying spider with needle hands (the same needle hands that seemed to lovingly craft the doll in the film’s opening sequence), it calls to mind the sculptures of Louise Bourgeois. In her “Cell” series, Bourgeois created mini houses out of found objects like discarded doors and grating and filled them with objects related to feminine domestic stereotypes like sewing supplies, clothes, etc.: [caption id="attachment_692" align="aligncenter" width="296" caption="Louise Bourgeois, interior of "Cell VII" (1998). Note the eerie hanging undergarments and miniature house."][/caption] Another Bourgeois recurring visual motif is spiders, representing her own mother and universal stereotypes of mothers (one is actually entitle "Maman") and exploring their creepiness and yet comfortable familiarity and harmlessness: [caption id="attachment_699" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Louise Bourseois, "Spider" (1997). Note the cage / house enveloped by the enormous arachnid, and scraps of fabric clinging to the sides contribute to the mother / domicile theme."][/caption] Compare Bourgeois' large but protective Spider to Coraline's Other Mother as a distinctly evil spider who deploys a web not to catch pesky insects but to entrap Coraline herself: [caption id="attachment_694" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "][/caption]

In the final scene of Coraline, domestic bliss is achieved by unifying her family and the previously indifferent neighbors in the act of planting tulips, a pared-down version of domesticity, handiness, and community. They’re not perfect -- Coraline’s mother complains about the dirt, Bobinski pulls out tulips bulbs to replace them with beets, and the end result is not the stunning spectacle of the Other World’s garden -- but it is a more realistic picture of imperfect homeyness. Now allow me to lay some incredible fun facts on you about the meticulous crafty creation of this film:

To construct 1 puppet, 10 individuals had to work 3-4 months.
About 45 of Coraline's pajamas were screen painted with printed patterns where every dot had to line up along the seams of every frock in precisely the same place for consistency.
For the character of Coraline, there were 28 different puppets of varying sizes; the main Coraline puppet stands 9.5 inches high.
All fabric was hand woven or hand knit to achieve the correct scale.
The only leather the production could find that was thin enough to make the doll shoes and Mr. Bobinsky's boots came from antique Victorian gloves.
Buttons and zippers were also handmade for the film to suit the scale.
Costumers used pins, surgical tools and tweezers to construct the garments.
Each of Coraline's star sweaters took 6 weeks to 6 months to design and knit on knitting needles like toothpicks. (On the website in Coraline’s room there is a film short on miniature knits. It will blow your mind a little.)

HISTORY OF SEWING IN THE HOME Coraline tapped into the familiarity we have with women performing acts like cooking, cleaning, and sewing: the audience presumably watches the film with knowing amusement as Coraline’s father makes a dinner which resembles the gelatinous, sludgy meals from Better Off Dead (1985). We learn that Coraline’s mother is a good cook but has prioritized professional work and has relegated the dinner chore to the inept (though good-intentioned) father. The Other Mother then lures Coraline with elaborate, beautifully presented meals and a homemade sweater ensemble. There is a rich history binding women to sewing. "A woman who does not know how to sew is as deficient in her education as a man who cannot write," Eliza Farrar wrote in The Young Lady's Friend (1838). Creating, altering and mending the family's clothing and household textiles were domestic duties that kept most 18th and 19th-century women tethered to their sewing baskets; until the late 19th century nearly all clothing was made in the home. According to Godey's Lady's Book, it took about 14 hours to make a man's dress shirt and at least 10 for a simple dress. A middle-class housewife spent several days a month making and mending her family's clothes even with the help of a hired seamstress. Sewing wasn’t all drudgery, though. Needlework served utilitarian purposes in the home, but also allowed women to communicate and assert their individual identities, beliefs, and aspirations with creativity and skill. The anticipation of weddings and births fueled creative energy and inspired impressive handiwork which was often functional -- but not always -- as in samplers which showcased a woman's cross-stitching dexterity by forming alphabets in varying typefaces, geometric borders, and picture scenes. Linens, blankets and other handmade textiles made up the bulk of a girl's hope chest (a.k.a. "marriage chest"), preparing her for her household duties as a wife and serving as advance proof of her sewing skill and worth as a woman and future matriarch. [caption id="attachment_702" align="aligncenter" width="277" caption="Early 19th century sewing sampler stitched by Elizabeth Lyle when a young girl. The text in the center reads,"Elizabeth Lyle worked this in the eleventh year of my age. In the morning think what you have to do. And at night ask yourself what you have done." "][/caption] Sewing circles were commonly formed by women, comprised of neighbors and relatives who would gather at a house and work on their sewing chores together. Women would sometimes swap portions of their own work with their friends who were particularly adept at a specific tasks. This happily merged what could be lonely drudgery with pleasurable socializing and political discussion (though the latter is rarely acknowledged). [caption id="attachment_695" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=""Sewing Circle" by Louis Henry Charles Moeller (1855 - 1930)"][/caption] Sadly, sewing was often taken for granted as a skill -- seamstresses were perceived as unimaginative lackeys who just followed instructions that any person might perform, and not as visionaries who could conceptualize how to take two-dimensional materials and connect them to form three-dimensional structures that envelope a body and yet can be gotten into easily, who possessed the skill to adapt techniques to various textures and weights, to say nothing of the artistic choices of color, style, and fit. Appreciation aside, there was a drastic interruption of this centuries-old tradition in the mid 19th century. It wasn't until the House of Worth (founded in 1858) when a man took the reigns of dressmaking, removed it from the home and created a pampered, decadent purchasing experience, that sewing took on any cachet or respect as a profession (see my earlier post on The Tea Gown in Fashion and Art for more on the House of Worth). The Industrial Revolution heralded the invention of the sewing machine (patented by Elias Howe in 1845), cheap labor and the growing factory system, standardization of sizes, and outcropping of distribution methods like apparel and department stores, all of which contributed to an increase in demand of ready-to-wear garments. This was the beginning of consumers' expectations for hyper-accelerated turnaround of new styles, necessitating ever-briefer time between designers' visions, prototype creations, and mass market availability. It could be argued that the sewing machine eased women of much of the time consuming burden of clothing their families, but a contrary view is that the sewing machine snatched a labor of love, pride, and skill from women, not to mention the social community bonding. And though it's distasteful to many modern women to think of being trapped in their houses all day, it was a small leap from the workrooms of House of Worth to the factories and notoriously dangerous conditions of garment factories (like the infamous Triangle Factory), exploiting the poor. Though sweatshops certainly exist in America today, many more are in developing countries with desperate-and-therefore-cheap labor forces, doubly exploited by consumer-hungry countries abroad and their own government systems which do not protect them with worker's rights addressing age minimums, hour maximums, safety standards, etc. [caption id="attachment_706" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Jacob Riis, Necktie workshop in Division Street tenement (1889)"][/caption] In terms of household implications, the sewing machine was only the first of many labor-saving devices for the home (partially by altering sewing from a home activity to a factory one); washing machines, dryers, dishwashers and vacuum cleaners all made housekeeping easier and cut down the work time required. An important consequence of all this labor saving has been the diminished woman's role as household manager. This gradual loss of status helped undermine the satisfaction many women formerly found in the homemaking role and encouraged them to seek more demanding employment in other places, as we see Coraline's mother has chosen her profession over domestic work. In most industrialized countries these days, sewing, needlework, knitting, crocheting, quilting, etc. have been relegated to niche markets (still mostly women) who have self-consciously resurrected the skills for hobby, not generally necessity. This is why we all understand how Coraline is taken in by her Other Mother's handmade overtures. I loved Coraline not only because it was a good, creepy story, but because its meticulous production methods showcased the hand-made theme present in the narrative, a far cry from the digitally created worlds of almost all current animation (which can absolutely be well done too). I like, too, how the simple black button icon of Coraline is a symbol of sewing and domestic familiarity twisted beautifully into a tool of sinister manipulation. Further Reading:

“The Culture of Sewing: Gender, Consumption and Home Dressmaking” by Barbara Burman
“History of Sewing” online study guide
“Women's Work: The First 20,000 Years Women, Cloth, and Society in Early Times” by Elizabeth Wayland Barber
"The Making of Coraline" in Extra Features on Coraline DVD
"How the Other Half Lives" Jacob Riis photographs of exploited poor Lower East Siders, NY

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Kennedy Fashion

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:23:59 +0000

[caption id="attachment_770" align="aligncenter" width="260" caption="John, Robert and Edward Kennedy, 1960"][/caption] With the recent passing of Edward "Teddy" Kennedy, I wanted to write something about Kennedy fashion but for better or worse, I read "The Look of Rich Tradition" article by Robin Givhan that pretty much sums up anything I would've said:

"their attire so perfectly captures a not-so-distant era in the culture. Those images of the Kennedy clan -- so steeped in mythology -- speak of a particular kind of subtly sporty American style that the fashion industry has devalued. It also calls to mind a brand of noblesse oblige politics that our culture now regards with suspicion."

Read the full Washington Post article here. And then read the awesome Ad Busters' rebuttal here.

Dior F10 - no pants

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:17:46 +0000

Dior F12 - opaque slip skirt

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:18:50 +0000

Dior F09 - sheer crinoline skirt

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:19:48 +0000

Dior F09 - bra and ballgown skirt

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:25:49 +0000

sagging stockings

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:27:38 +0000

Liz Taylor in Butterfield 8 poster - with added fur over slip

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:28:32 +0000

Dior F09 - purple outdoor coat and slip dress

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:34:57 +0000

Lee Remick in pants, Anatomy of a Murder, 1951

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:37:41 +0000

Lee Remick dowdy in courtroom, Anatomy of a Murder, 1951

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:39:00 +0000

Academy Award¨-nominated director Peter Bogdanovich will join actresses Carol Lynley and Eva Marie Saint for a centennial tribute to three-time Academy Award-nominated director and producer Otto Preminger on Thursday, November 2, at 8 p.m. at the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills. The tribute, hosted by Bogdanovich, will present a selection of film clips and onstage discussions with Hope and Victoria Preminger, the directorÕs widow and daughter, respectively, as well as Lynley and Saint. As part of the centennial celebration, the Academy will also present a retrospective film series highlighted by recent restorations and newly made prints from the Otto Preminger Collection at the Academy Film Archive. Pictured here: Lee Remick and James Stewart with Eve Arden in the background in "Anatomy of a Murder," which will screen at the Academy's Linwood Dunn Theater on Sunday, November 12, at 7 p.m.

Marlon Brando torn shirt Stella scene, Streetcar Named Desire, 1951

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:40:40 +0000

sagging jeans

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:41:59 +0000

Innerwear as Outerwear Pt 1 - Mid-Century and Today

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:05:47 +0000

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="240" caption="Balmain dress and petticoat, circa 1950"][/caption]

Though I love me some fashion, I confess I do not keep up with every single fashion collection that graces the runways (is it even possible, I sometimes wonder?). However, I happened to catch Dior's Fall 09 collection recently and fell in love -- both in the playful I-want-to-wear-that way and also the that-epitomizes-such-an-interesting-historical-trend way, leading to the inevitable I-must-blog-about-that-now conclusion. And so here we are.

For the couture Fall 09 collection of the Christian Dior label, designer John Galliano has played with the staples of '50s innerwear and supporting garments by revealing them, eliminating portions of the outerwear and exposing the skeleton of what actually creates those feminine curves a la Dior's own post WWII “New Look.” Galliano admitted that he'd been inspired by photos of Dior himself dressing his models before one of his salon shows in the 1950s. Galliano took the state of semi-dress and moved it from behind the curtain to in front of it, going one step further in his homage by presenting his 2009 collection in an intimate salon-esque setting rather than the modern blockbuster runway format. Here are a couple of my favorite items from the series:

[caption id="attachment_742" align="aligncenter" width="206" caption="The skirt is pared down to the stiff, transparent structural garment necessary to create the "naturally" feminine looks of the 1950s."][/caption] [caption id="attachment_741" align="aligncenter" width="174" caption="She appears fully dressed... except the outer skirt we expect is missing."][/caption] [caption id="attachment_773" align="aligncenter" width="224" caption="This has a modest silhouette but is obviously completely gauzy, ironically revealing "proper" 1950s understructures."][/caption]

Let's take a closer look at the fashions of the mid-20th century from which Galliano derived inspiration, shall we?

A tremendously successful Maidenform bra ad campaign in the '50s and '60s featured models in ordinary situations, dressed traditionally from the waist down, but swathed only in Maidenform bras above the waist.

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="244" caption=""I dreamed I lived like a queen in my Maidenform bra,"1953 ad"][/caption]

It's incredible how like Dior's collection these ads are, non?

[caption id="attachment_745" align="aligncenter" width="230" caption=" "][/caption]

World War II necessitated rationing of all kinds: gasoline, metal, fabric, chemical dyes, and more. When the war concluded, droves of young military men returned to the States, hungry for women in all their stereotypically soft, curvy, feminine glory. Post-war women wanted to mimic glamorous actresses they'd been seeing in escapist movies all along, to replace the utilitarian suits and pencil skirts they'd adopted out of patriotic wartime necessity. Fashion responded to these desires and took advantage of the lifted restrictions to create voluminous skirts with yards of fabric, cinched waists and uplifted, pointy breasts to exaggerate the idealized curvy feminine body. And, as always, structural undergarments had tremendous import in realizing that ever-morphing, ever-exaggerated, idealized shape.

Undergarment retailers capitalized on the lifted restrictions by experimenting with color, sheer fabrics, lace and printed patterns, new fabrics like Dacron, nylon, Spandex, and rayon. These synthetic materials (several originating in government and military labs) provided durable, stretchy, lightweight alternatives to stiffer, heavier undergarments made of natural fibers like cotton and linen which needed boning for support, shape, and structure. Pantyhose were introduced in 1959, combining panties and “hose” or stockings, a mini revolution in underwear. Stockings even as late as the early 20^th century were not terribly stretchy. Romanticized today (not least of all by Yours Truly), the pesky back seams had to be manually straightened and their leg shapes were predetermined. So if your legs didn't conform, you were left with distinctly un-sexy, ill-fitting stockings with loose knees and saggy fabric wrinkles:

[caption id="attachment_746" align="aligncenter" width="207" caption=" "][/caption]

In the late 1940s, designers like Jacques Fath incorporated corset lacings into evening wear, a risqué reference that also reflected the fashion for hourglass figures and the return of conventional notions of femininity post-WWII. While the glamorous films of the '40s (which generally depicted wealthy society folk whose extravagant lifestyles were left suspiciously unaffected by the war raging in the real world) were the inspiration in the early 1950s, films of that mid-century decade placed their own indelible stamp upon the collective fashion ideals, shifting the trends from genteel aristocrat to slightly bawdy Everyman (or Everywoman as the case often was), creeping toward the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Marilyn Monroe simultaneously shocked and delighted audiences by going braless on and off sets, a kind of prelude to the feminist-organized bra burning episodes of the '60s without the overt politics. Elizabeth Taylor wore a custom made slip for much of Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958), and the sizzling posters of her call girl character in BUtterfield 8 (1960) depicted her with a heavy fur coat draped over her body-hugging slip, heightening the impact of her near-nakedness:

[caption id="attachment_747" align="aligncenter" width="268" caption="Liz Taylor in BUtterfield 8 poster. Note the "suitable only for adults" disclaimer!"][/caption]

Galliano similarly pairs outdoor coats with slips:

[caption id="attachment_748" align="aligncenter" width="256" caption=" "][/caption]

In Anatomy of a Murder (1959) attorney James Stewart is forced to request his client's wife wear a girdle in court to make her appear respectable and decent -- though he admits with embarrassment that the young woman doesn't need one to control her “jiggle” (more to the audience's discomfort than to the precocious sex kitten character to whom he is speaking).

[caption id="attachment_749" align="aligncenter" width="214" caption="BEFORE: Lee Remick in sandellous pants early in Anatomy of a Murder"][/caption]

[caption id="attachment_750" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="AFTER: Lee Remick deliberately dowdy in courtroom in Anatomy of a Murder. Though unseen, she presumably wears a girdle under her deliberately dowdy tweed skirt."][/caption]

Here we see the girdle on the model, who, like Lee Resnick above, does not actually require such a supportive garment to mold her shape:

[caption id="attachment_740" align="aligncenter" width="166" caption=" "][/caption]

In Rear Window (1954), Costume Designer Edith Head ensconces Grace Kelly's socialite character in a dress of layered tulle, a transparent material that is traditionally used as an underlayer to provide volume to outerskirts. While this dress hardly screams "vulgar," it's definitely a wee bit risqué:

[caption id="attachment_772" align="aligncenter" width="240" caption="The see-through wrap Grace Kelly dangles is just one layer of the same material used for her skirt, typifying the deliberately impractical, beautiful glamour popular post-WWII (a transparent wrap not only doesn't assist modesty, it doesn't shield from the cold either)."][/caption]

And here is a Dior creation:

[caption id="attachment_774" align="aligncenter" width="230" caption="This skirt has fewer layers of tulle than the example above, drawing attention to the sheerness of the material which is more commonly used in lingerie."][/caption] [caption id="attachment_751" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "][/caption]

The steamy Streetcar Named Desire (1951) is set in humid New Orleans where characters languor in states of semi-dress. In a poignant-though-subtle twist, Kim Hunter's ferociously monogamous character Stella walks around the apartment in a slip, in stark contrast to the false prudery of Vivien Leigh's Blanche DuBois whose extreme, inconvenient modesty (three adults are living in a tiny one bedroom apartment) belies her previous promiscuity. Marlon Brando's T-shirts are downright mundane to us now, but at that time T-shirts were strictly male underwear and Brando's brutish, uncouth character was conveyed in part by the absence of a proper button-down shirt over his. He compounds his simmering sexuality by changing shirts in front of the camera, and in the famous “Stella!” scene, his shredded T-shirt actually peels off him lewdly, testament to the fragility of the undergarment:

In Rebel Without a Cause (1955), James Dean and his gang flouted conventions and, like Brando's character, used dress (or rather, the state of near undress) to signal their outsider, somewhat misfit status, with all the sexy implications the forbidden carries.

[caption id="attachment_780" align="aligncenter" width="320" caption="As the posters for Liz Taylor in BUtterfield 8 did, the T-shirt or undershirt is paired with an outdoor coat for heightened impact."][/caption]

Even in recent years, there is an increasing backlash to men displaying their underwear. This latest effort by some citizens and politicians to enact laws forbidding sagging jeans that expose boxers is tinged with a distinctly racial tone, as it's primarily young black men who follow this trend (conceived in minority-heavy prisons where inmates may not wear belts) and who are therefore targeted with the desired sartorial censorship.

[caption id="attachment_752" align="aligncenter" width="292" caption=" "][/caption]

Obviously the idea of the forbidden, the secret, the hidden, still offends and titillates today, and Galliano's collection is testament to this enduring tension. With a self-conscious nod to vintage lingerie, the prominently featured seamed stockings are an erotic, romantic reference to outdated style. No longer deemed essential for respectability, girdles, garters, and conical bullet bras are relegated to pure camp and arousal, which some women choose to wear as a provocative statement that we all understand to be vintage. Dior's collection reclaims the dampened vulgarity by exposing the contraptions that hold stockings up, that support and distort the body for added curious eroticism, and perhaps even a sense of uncomfortable indecency, a feat in this desensitized age of exposed bra straps, halter tops and micro miniskirts. Though there are grumbles relating to the appropriation of underwear worn as outerwear even today, this is not a new phenomenon by any stretch. Attitudes toward the naked body and sexuality, notions of privacy, discretion and sexual identification are constantly changing and fashion changes with them. Return for Part Deux next week for more on underwear as outerwear, this time as a political statement....

FURTHER READING:

“Are Your Jeans Sagging? Go Directly to Jail.” NY Times, 8/30/07
20^th century silhouette and support timeline
Fashion, Desire and Anxiety, by Rebecca Arnold
1950s underwear and ads at Fashion-era.com

Recommend this post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

John, Robert and Edward Kennedy, 1960

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:57:50 +0000

Grace Kelly in sheer Edith Head dress, Rear Window, 1954

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:17:31 +0000

Dior F10 - transparent black dress

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:27:33 +0000

Dior F10 - transparent tulle skirt

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:34:20 +0000

I Dreamed I lived like a Queen in my Maidenform Bra, ad 1953

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:29:05 +0000

Rebel Without A Cause in undershirts

Tove Hermanson — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:46:08 +0000

New Collaboration

Tove Hermanson — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:47:35 +0000

I am one of the newest bloggers for the Style section of the Huffington Post, that amazing online newspaper! It's a no-pay gig, but I am thrilled!

First article to appear shortly.

the Vampire, Edward Burne-Jones, 1897

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:56:49 +0000

Theda Bara in A Fool There Was, sucubus

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:59:01 +0000

Paul Poiret, harem ensemble, 1911

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:16:16 +0000

Emilienne d'Alencon, maybe Salome2

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:19:45 +0000

Ida Rubinstein in Ballet Russe Scheherazade, 1910

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:21:21 +0000

Erte Fashion Sketch with turban and harem pants

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:24:17 +0000

mata hari

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:26:18 +0000

Theda Bara in hat

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:27:36 +0000

Louise Brooks, 1928

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:31:49 +0000

Louise Brooks in Pandoras Box Y backstrap

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:32:48 +0000

Louise Brooks in Pandoras Box curled hair disguise

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:34:18 +0000

Helmut Newton, reclining woman and gun

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:35:31 +0000

The Original Vamps: Silent, Deadly, & Stylish

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:34:04 +0000

[caption id="attachment_822" align="aligncenter" width="203" caption="The vamp image, incorporating the requisite sex and death themes."][/caption]

Occasionally fancying myself an exotic woman of mystery too, I have a special place in my heart for that early 20^th century icon, The Vamp. When my friend (whose intelligent and fun horror blog And Now the Screaming Starts this is cross-posted on) suggested I write about them, I welcomed the opportunity to revisit some silent films when this aesthetic was solidified in concept and look.

THEDA BARA & THE LURE OF THE EXOTIC

Though Theda Bara (1890 – 1955) enshrouded her adult life in mystery, she was born plain old Theodosia Goodman in Cincinnati, OH. Hollywood producers gave her the anagram of “Arab death,” on the one hand cultivating her image of smoky, exotic sensualism -- claiming she lit incense on her sets and swathed herself in tiger pelts -- and on the other hand, hyping the macabre and frightening side of her.

Most recognize the term "vamp" to mean a femme fatale -- an irresistible woman who leads to the destruction of those who surround her, typically men. But the term was initially coined only after the success of Theda Bara's single surviving film, A Fool There Was (1915), in which her gleefully man-destroying character is listed in the credits simply as “The Vampire.” Based on Rudyard Kipling's poem “The Vampire” (1897) and Sir Edward Burne-Jones' painting of the same name (1897); the visual inspiration is obvious:

[caption id="attachment_783" align="aligncenter" width="218" caption=" Sir Edward Burne-Jones' "The Vampire""][/caption] In A Fool There Was, The Vampire is seen in her nightgown several times, casting a spectral quality over her. Opaque and voluminous, they are not lingerie we are accustomed to today, but were risqué for the time, obviously derived from Burne-Jones' sex-laden picture. [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="269" caption="The Vampire grinning over her dead lover."][/caption]

When wearing outerwear, The Vampire wore the amusingly impractical (and thankfully short-lived) hobble skirt, topped with exotic turbans and heavily kohled eyes. To seduce her victim she drops a flower and lifts her skirt to reveal her ankle -- she is unashamed to show blatantly erotic skin.

What differentiated Theda from other actresses of her time was her other-worldliness, which she cultivated with her Oriental aesthetics. The horror genre is filled with tales of distant or remote lands; the audience's presumed unfamiliarity with the locale makes the fantastic tales slightly more plausible; the storyteller prays on the public's inherent mistrust and simultaneous attraction to the exotic, The Other. Though the most exotic location in A Fool There Was was Italy (puzzlingly portrayed as a palm tree paradise more suggestive of the Far East), The Vampire produces a non-specific and highly erotic exoticism. Not a tremendous actor, it was largely Theda's unusual costumes and makeup on and off-screen that enshrouded her in Oriental mystique and secured her notoriety.

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="78" caption="Theda Bara in hobble skirt and turban ensemble"][/caption]

Promises of harem girls with all the connotations of master / slave dynamics and orgies have been irrevocably linked to soft, sheer, feminine fabrics that simultaneously cover and reveal forbidden flesh (see my post on Innerwear as Outerwear for more on this subject). Seemingly anticipating the Egyptian madness that occurred after the 1922 discovery of King Tutankhamun’s tomb, the Far East captivated the imagination of the Western world. Designer Paul Poiret (1879 - 1944) made his mark on the fashion world by morphing the 19^th century S-shape silhouette into un-corseted, athletic figures, and he incorporated many lose-fitting, Oriental-inspired designs to this end including harem pants, “formal” silk pajamas, and turbans. Poiret designed extravagant costumes for stage productions, hosted legendary Arabian-themed costume parties, his fondness for theatrical-scale dress-up evident in the fashions he produced for general consumption.

[caption id="attachment_785" align="aligncenter" width="139" caption="Paul Poiret, harem ensemble, 1911"][/caption]

Even earlier was Emilienne d’Alençon (1869 – 1946) who performed at the Folies Bergères in the 1890s (with trained rabbits!) and was just as famous a courtesan, who wore an Art Nouveau inspired Salome costumes:

[caption id="attachment_786" align="aligncenter" width="79" caption=" "][/caption]

The Ballet Russes' performance of “Schéhérazade” in 1910 was enormously successful, due in large part to the extravagant costumes of vague Eastern inspiration:

[caption id="attachment_787" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Ida Rubinstein in Ballet Russe "Scheherazade," 1910"][/caption]

Erte, who worked with Poiret and with whom I am obsessed, was yet another costume designer who marketed sensual Oriental decadence for lavish stage productions.

[caption id="attachment_789" align="aligncenter" width="210" caption="Erte Fashion Sketch with turban and harem pants"][/caption] Mata Hari (1876 – 1917), the exotic Orientalist dancer of Dutch descent who posed as princess from Java while acting as courtesan and spy, was executed by firing squad just 2 years after A Fool There Was. Rumor has it that she blew a kiss to her executioners.

[caption id="attachment_790" align="aligncenter" width="156" caption=" Mata Hari"][/caption]

Similar to our Theda Bara, non?

[caption id="attachment_791" align="aligncenter" width="161" caption="Theda Bara publicity shot for Cleopatra (1917)"][/caption]

Theda tapped into a cultural obsession with styles of the Far East, while exploiting the unease and xenophobia that often accompanies our regard of The Other, rolling it all into a destructive, man-eating "vampire" character. The Vamp concept was to evolve, though never to shake the ruinous qualities Theda imbued in her.

LOUISE BROOKS & MODERN ADVANCEMENTS

As Theda's star waned, a new Vamp talent stepped up: Louise Brooks (1906 - 1985). If Theda was the vaguely ancient, exotic vamp, Louise was her modern flapper vamp successor. As women's rights gained momentum in America, a powerful new woman emerged, wearing visible makeup as she walked to the voting polls, smoking and drinking and dancing in shift dresses that bared shins! Even as many women embraced this freedom, societal concerns of propriety remained and moralist detractors prophesized hedonistic anarchy. Dress also changed radically in the nineteen-teens, with fewer layers that a woman could slip into (and out of!), exposing more skin than ever. And so Louise Brooks was a very different looking vamp from Theda, even while her characters carried the torch of man destroyer.

[caption id="attachment_820" align="aligncenter" width="240" caption="More often than not, Louise Brooks smiles, a huge departure from Theda Bara's vamp image. Here she sweetly pours a drink for her stressed out lover."][/caption]

Pandora's Box (1929) was adapted from 2 erotic plays written in the 1890s by Frank Wedekind, but updated to modern times. As many young women cut their cumbersome long hair, Brooks as the Lulu character sports her own iconic, modern bob and wears clothes un-constrictive enough that she can do light gymnastics (like swing from a strongman's biceps), hinting at the newly acceptable athleticism for women (see my post on Athletic Aesthetics). The erotic zones had shifted and multiplied since Theda Bara’s time, moving from the ankle to the shoulders, back, legs, and breasts which were often displayed braless.

[caption id="attachment_793" align="aligncenter" width="240" caption=" Lulu appears practically naked in this Y backstrap dress, with a whiff of rope bondage."][/caption]

Having become a somewhat accidental murderess, Lulu goes into hiding and curls the famous hair, sweeping it off her forehead. Ridiculous as it sounds, Brooks' hairstyle was so recognizable that this shoddy disguise actually succeeds in confusing the audience a little, though Lulu is discovered anyway.

[caption id="attachment_794" align="aligncenter" width="150" caption=" "][/caption]

Lulu is a dangerous vamp not because she's controlling and malicious, but because she's a beautiful young woman whose very power is derived from her lack of pretension and seeming ignorance of her own desirability, her delicious un-self-conciousness. One-upping Bara's Vampire, Lulu was a double threat desired by both men and women, so potent was her sexual power. The Pandora of the Greek myth was not an inherently evil woman either, just one whose curiosity got the better of her, with unfortunately dire consequences. Lulu is not even interested in money or advancing her social status -- she shows equal preference for newspaper moguls and paupers, all of whom are trying to exploit her. However, she shares with other vamps her unrepentantance for acts that inconvenience or even destroy others and herself -- they are all animalistic, with no regrets (as a side note, non-moral tales like these was only possible to portray in American cinema pre 1934, before the Hays Code was enacted).

She’s an unusual vamp fatale because she doesn’t have malicious intent. “Money, they all want money!” she complains of her blackmailers and suitors alike. She's not a gold-digger, she's simply a careless and carefree pleasure-seeker -- exactly what conservatives feared about real-life flappers and, by extension, the women's movement.

RESURRECTION OF THE VAMP

Since these early 20^th century beginnings, the vamp has been resurrected in film and fashion many times. Blood sucking, literal and figurative, has unavoidably sexual connotations, and fetish gear and goth style has both influenced and been influenced by vamp(ire) lore. Fashion photographer Helmut Newton channels the sexy and macabre themes of bondage and female sexual power regularly. Even as women expose themselves in his photos, they seem to retain absolute authority over their settings:

[caption id="attachment_795" align="aligncenter" width="240" caption="Helmut Newton photo, c. 1990s"][/caption]

And Uma Thurman seemed to channel a bit of Louise Brooks herself with her portrayal of modern-day Mia Wallace, another beautiful, hedonistic woman whose pursuit of carnal pleasures (leading to the infamous drug overdose) jeopardizes all the men around her in Pulp Fiction (1994).

[caption id="attachment_817" align="aligncenter" width="229" caption=" "][/caption]

Impulse control is often explored in times of economic or political turmoil. True to point, there has been a rash of vampire productions recently including Twilight and the True Blood HBO series, but truth be told, I much prefer the original vamps!

Further Reading:

Fashion, Desire and Anxiety, Rebecca Arnold
Fashion Fetishism, David Kunzle
Fetish: Fashion, Sex & Power, Valerie Steele
Seduction: A Celebration of Sensual Style, Caroline Cox
“The Girl in the Black Helmut,” Kenneth Tynan

Recommend this Post:

: : : : : : : : : : :

Huffington Post icon

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:36:42 +0000

Thread for Thought logo

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:39:25 +0000

huffington post logo

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:41:03 +0000

Uma Thurman as Mia Wallace in Pulp Fiction

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:35:04 +0000

Louise Brooks in Pandoras Box pouring drink

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:55:39 +0000

Theda Bara and skeleton

Tove Hermanson — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:10:41 +0000